Bersatu strategist warns Singapore of ‘pain’ for stance on maritime dispute


Bersatu supreme council member Dr Rais Hussin Mohamed Ariff says Singapore, which is embroiled in a maritime dispute with Malaysia, needs to 'smarten up' and 'live and let live'. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, December 9, 2018.

BERSATU supreme council member Dr Rais Hussin Mohamed Ariff said Singapore will get “pain by a thousand cuts” for its position on the maritime dispute with Malaysia.

The policy and strategy bureau head of Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s party said the city state will gain nothing “by hardening its stance” against its neighbour.

In a commentary published on the Malaysiakini and Malay Mail portals today, Rais said Singapore needs to “smarten up” and “live and let live”.

The two countries have been embroiled in a spat over their maritime borders since Singapore revealed earlier this week that Malaysia had unilaterally extended Johor’s port limits on October 25.

Singapore also said Malaysian ships, including vessels belonging to the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency and Marine Department, have made 14 intrusions into its territorial waters over the past two weeks.

Protesting the “unlawful activities”, Singapore has called on Malaysia to withdraw the vessels and return to the pre-October 25 status quo.

Singapore often takes a ‘holier-than-thou approach’

Rais noted that Singapore had “kept growing and growing” after its separation from Malaysia in 1965, but pointed out that without Malaysia “providing all forms of auxiliary support, be they passive or active”, its southern neighbour “would arguably not be where it is”.

“A small gesture of kindness to Malaysia, even the occasional appreciative word, would be nice.

“Instead, Singapore often takes a holier-than-thou approach – believing that only they are right and everyone else is wrong. This includes the current spat over the 1979 maritime border.

“If Singapore has reached an economic size that is larger than ours, why can’t we consider them to be an equal power that we respect, yet demand due privilege – or right – from, in terms of adjusting the price of water sold to them?”

Under the 1962 Water Agreement, Singapore’s national water agency, PUB, may draw 250 million gallons of raw water from Sg Johor daily, at 3 sen per 1,000 gallons.

Dr Mahathir first said in June that water is among the issues with Singapore “that we need to settle”, criticising the 1962 deal as “too costly” and “manifestly ridiculous”.

In response, Singapore said the 1962 deal is “a fundamental agreement that was guaranteed by both governments in the 1965 Separation Agreement”, and that both countries “must comply fully with all the provisions of these agreements”.

It also said Malaysia had lost its right to review the price of water under the 1987 agreement.

Bersatu's Dr Rais Hussin Mohamed Ariff says Singapore's jet fighters have made incursions into Johor or Pahang airspace, but Malaysia has taken a 'live and let live' approach. – EPA pic, December 9, 2018.

“But this is where Singapore needs to smarten up,” said Rais.

“Assuming Malaysia agrees lock, stock and barrel to only reviewing the agreement in 2061 – essentially adopting, or indeed, internalising Singapore’s legal logic – wouldn’t that stiff and literal approach also endanger the republic’s own position, since both would be unyielding by then?”

Singapore’s jet fighters ‘made incursions’ into Malaysian airspace

Rais said Singapore’s jet fighters have made “momentary incursions into Johor or Pahang airspace”, but Malaysia has “taken a ‘live and let live’ approach with this, given that we know that Singapore is smart enough not to spoil for a fight”.

“If Malaysia asserts its sovereignty and right to self-defence, as Singapore patrol boats seem to want to do in the new areas claimed by the former in 2018, we would have been having dogfights in our skies since 1965.”

He did not elaborate on the claims, but such allegations are not new, with both the Singapore High Commission to Malaysia and Defence Ministry having refuted them in the past.

Assertive actions at sea would “ruin the spirit of peaceful coexistence and collaboration”, said Rais, citing how Singapore would want to seek information on “the degree to which Muslim radicals returning from battlefields like Syria and other Middle Eastern hotspots have been radicalised”.

“If that is the case, why should Singapore be so hard on any naval intrusions when Malaysia has said little, if nothing, about its aerial incursions?”

If Malaysia takes the same hard approach, “Singapore’s airspace would be tied in knots”, he said.

“Any Singaporean attempt to build its budget airline with Tuas as its base would be thwarted by the (Malaysian) Transport Ministry, on the grounds of noise pollution inflicted on the residents of southern Johor.”

Rais said there is nothing that Singapore can gain by hardening its stance against Malaysia.

“It helps not to turn a spat into a spar. Because then what? Fight and tear at each other’s faces? Everyone knows that wars are meant to make orphans of children.

“There is nothing to gain by issuing threats to interdict Malaysian ships in Malaysian or Singaporean waters. What they will get is only pain by a thousand cuts.” – TODAYonline, December 9, 2018.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments


  • If they are ready......they think we are not ready?

    Posted 5 years ago by Azis Yusoff · Reply

  • hello..what nonsense..get your facts right and talk sense....and you are a strategist???,,,and don't threaten.

    Posted 5 years ago by Lipdah Lia · Reply

  • Jangan pijak Singapore. You think they dont know their rights ? You can toughen up but dont infringe on their rights. There are rules amd
    regulations to follow . Please dont embarrass us .

    Posted 5 years ago by Jacob Hong · Reply

  • Have you read all the agreements as well as understand the nature of all the events. If cannot understand due to Low English standard then get a lawyer translate for you before making all these stupid comment. Umno copy cat.....

    Posted 5 years ago by Wei Kuan Tan · Reply