DR Mujahid Yusof Rawa still holds on to his stand that Dr Zakir Naik’s teaching is demeaning to other faiths and is not suited for Malaysia.
The minister in charge of Islamic affairs, however, defended his meeting with the controversial Muslim preacher last month, saying as a minister anyone could come and see him.
The Indian preacher is one of Malaysia’s most controversial “permanent residents” as he is known for stirring hatred against other religions with his lectures and messages.
While Zakir is a wanted man in India, having had his citizenship revoked, he was granted permanent resident by the former Najib Razak government.
When Pakatan Harapan won federal power and Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad took over, he said Malaysia would not deport Zakir “as long as he is not creating any problem” in the country.
But Zakir’s name cropped up again, two days after the deadly Sri Lanka bombings at three churches and four hotels which claimed more than 360 lives and injured 500 others.
The mastermind behind a suicide bombing at a hotel was identified as Islamic extremist Moulvi Zahran Hashim, an imam with a history of racism and Islamic supremacy.
Zahran had also posted several YouTube videos and in one of them, the radical Muslim extremist said – “What can Sri Lankan Muslims do for Dr Zakir Naik?” – leading experts to believe that Zahran was inspired by Zakir.
This led to calls in Malaysia for the controversial preacher to be thrown out of the country.
Two days after the Sri Lanka attacks, Malaysian activist Farouk A. Peru started a petition urging Dr Mahathir to act against fundamentalist Muslim preachers and evict Zakir from the country to “stop fundamentalist preachers before it is too late”.
In the petition, Farouk reminded Dr Mahathir of his decision to allow Zakir to remain in Malaysia when the man was wanted by his home country India for allegedly inciting communal disharmony and other unlawful activities.
In an interview two days ago, Mujahid said his stance towards Zakir was “the same”. Last September, Mujahid described Zakir’s methods as demeaning to other faiths and that such an approach was ill-suited for Malaysia.
But in the March 13 meeting, Mujahid described Dr Zakir’s missionary work “inspiring” in a Facebook post.
After a backlash, Mujahid said he explained to Zakir the government’s approach on managing Islamic affairs and of the country’s communal sensitivities.
Mujahid stressed there was no U-turn on his stance concerning Dr Zakir, admitting feeling baffled over the criticism he received for the meeting.
“When I say something about Zakir, people say that is good, Mujahid. But when Zakir comes to see me that’s suddenly not good.
“What’s the problem? People come and see me people say that’s not good. They say he is not suitable as Malaysia is like this or that. I don’t understand,” the minister added. – April 26, 2019.
Comments
Posted 5 years ago by Mindy Singh · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Mindy Singh · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Tanahair Ku · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Malaysia New hope · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Danial Abdullah · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Léon Moch · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Lee Lee · Reply
It will be prevention is always better than cure.
Posted 5 years ago by Richard Foo · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Concerned Citizen · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Ravinder Singh · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Ravinder Singh · Reply
Surely Zakir Naik did not barge, or gate crash, into Mujahid's office. It was a pre-arranged meeting which could not have happened if Mujahid had not agreed to see him. It was an "audience" granted by Mujahid. Mujahid should have snubbed his request for the "audience". By giving him an "audience" (he was not there with some problem or issue that needed Mujahid's personal attention to resolve), Mujahid gave him importance and acknowledgment of his past and present "inspiring" teachings.
What if any of his "disciples" in Malaysia also say "
Posted 5 years ago by Ravinder Singh · Reply
Surely Zakir Naik did not barge, or gate crash, into Mujahid's office. It was a pre-arranged meeting which could not have happened if Mujahid had not agreed to see him. It was an "audience" granted by Mujahid. Mujahid should have snubbed his request for the "audience". By giving him an "audience" (he was not there with some problem or issue that needed Mujahid's personal attention to resolve), Mujahid gave him importance and acknowledgment of his past and present "inspiring" teachings.
What if any of his "disciples" in Malaysia also say "
Posted 5 years ago by Ravinder Singh · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Ravinder Singh · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Mindy Singh · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Rupert Lum · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Concerned Citizen · Reply