IGP wants more time to discuss IPCMC Bill


Inspector-General of Police Abdul Hamid Bador says there are points in the Independent Police Complaints of Misconduct Commission Bill 2019 that have not been given ‘fair attention’. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, November 28, 2019.

GIVE us more time and room for engagement and discussion about the Independent Police Complaints of Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) Bill 2019, said Inspector-General of Police Abdul Hamid Bador.

The man leading Malaysia’s 130,000-strong police force said some points raised on the proposed bill were not given “fair attention”.

Therefore, he said the government should not rush to table the bill, so that the IPCMC Parliament Special Select Committee could engage stakeholders and listen to the points raised by the police.

“Initially, I welcome IPCMC because I believe the bill is good for the country as it gives a more comprehensive approach in monitoring police.

“However, lately, I could see the efforts to rush the bill in parliament with so many ambiguities raised by the police, which is not good.

“Let’s give some time for the bill to be refined and the committee to address all issues raised, so, there will be a good law, which is fair to all: government, citizen and police, when it is passed by Parliament,” he told Bernama today.

The IPCMC Bill 2019 is expected to be tabled in Parliament next week. Yesterday, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Liew Vui Keong said the proposed changes had been presented to all MPs.

The committee has recommended 36 proposed changes to the bill.

However, several groups – including the Senior Police Officers Association – have urged the government to postpone its plans to table the bill next week as the association’s views were not taken into account and no changes were made.

Meanwhile, Hamid said he had written to the committee the “week before” to raise his concern on the proposed bill.

He added that the concerns raised were “very fair”.

“All points are listed in the letter… it does not mean that they have to accept everything but at least they could explain to us.

“I hope they could come out with a good explanation on why certain points are accepted and why the other are not.

“I don’t want a law passed, which becomes a subject of contention in court later. That is my concern.

“I do not want the bill be like ‘rumah siap, pahat berbunyi’ (the house is ready but the chisel is still making noises),” he said. – Bernama, November 28, 2019.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments


  • Fair comment from IGP. Select Committee must discuss with Police as the stakeholder on decision affecting the police force. Convince PDRM it's for the BENEFIT if the country. Discuss and negotiate on all angles of possibilities so that the law will cover all corners of societal fairness.

    Posted 4 years ago by James Wong · Reply

  • After another 20 years also this bill will never be passed.. deaths/murders will still continue in prisons and people incarcerated/jailed without due reason..even real terror suspects can get away scot-free all in the name of race and religion.. and all points towards a particular 94 year old crook who has practically destroyed this nation

    Posted 4 years ago by Francis Anthony · Reply

  • Why need more time when the police were wasting their time and resourced going after the ashes of a dead communist and doing the dirty work against innocent citizens based on trumped up allegations about a non-existent terrorist organisation?

    Posted 4 years ago by Rupert Lum · Reply