INTEGRITY can be made cheap if our common or agreed definitions of this concept are not rigorous enough.

For example, the often-quoted C.S. Lewis definition is a very good one, but may not be fully relevant in the modern world of media. The quote argues: “Integrity is doing the right thing even when no one is watching.” Maybe, the new quote should be: “Integrity is doing the right thing when everyone is watching.”

The former definition makes integrity a mere function of personal experience and an individual conscience, but as we are all aware from our personal lives, even conscience can be easily dulled. Over-exposure to a particular dark experience, over time, makes a continued exposure not as fearsome.

Therefore, my personal definition of integrity is: “Choosing to do the right thing at the right time in the right way.” There are three dimensions to this particular definition.

Firstly, the Lewis definition brings in the spiritual dimension of life, but such a reality is often defined only by personal conscience.

Secondly, the human choice and option of knowing the right thing, must focus on doing it at the right time, the first time and every time. But this, too, is only normative.

Thirdly, consciousness about any due process is knowing and electing to do right, but always only in the right way, or opting for the right due process. That always implies a group process, beyond anything merely individual or personal.

Any such “group-based process methodology of doing the right thing in the right way”, in today’s world, always requires “a 360° media-type accountability!”. The spotlight of global watchers is always on. Light shines in most dark spots.

Recently, Parliament hosted an advocacy programme organised jointly with the UK-based Westminster Foundation for Democracy.

It was an excellent programme on the culture and values of an authentic Parliament, with participation by the multiple sides of both Houses and society. Three of us, RMC OPs, were invited because we had advocated a proposal to improve democratic values within Parliament.

Nonetheless, I was personally less than satisfied that the core issue of leadership integrity within Parliament was not adequately discussed, discoursed or debated. Obviously, the design framing could not encourage that. The quality of representation and participation was clearly absent.

It is high time for Parliament to identify a clear focus on the next-generation leadership by younger citizens of all ethnicities and marginalised groups, to come together to make a common but complete argument.

Multidimensional integrity

The Integrity Institute of Malaysia, launched by former prime minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, produced a booklet called “Roots to Fruits”. Let me quote how it defined integrity: “Integrity is like a mighty tree that stands out in the forest. Its roots are deep, supporting a tall and hardy trunk, and its top is a crown of branches and green leaves. It blooms with large clusters of fruits in brilliant colours, ripe and ready to scatter their seeds. Birds and other animals find comfort perching on its secure branches.”

Likewise, a leader of integrity stands tall like a tree in the forest – often taller than other people. Deeply rooted and nurtured with the right values, the tree is able to handle the storms of life and ravages of times.

Usually, a strong character defines the leader who lives according to principles, driven by the right convictions that guide decision-making, in quite different and varied situations.

Therefore and thereby, living a life of integrity is a very high calling, but as the African saying goes, it takes a village to nurture such values of a high calling in any person. – March 3, 2019.

* KJ John worked in public service for 32 years, retired, and started a civil group for which he is chairman of the board. He writes to inform and educate, arguing for integration with integrity in Malaysia. He believes such a transformation has to start with the mind before it sinks into the heart!

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.