AGRICULTURE and Agro-based Industries minister Salahuddin Ayub should have taken the rap instead of his secretary-general after the fiasco involving the National Farmers’ Association (Nafas), said opposition leader Ismail Sabri Yaakob.
Ismail Sabri, who is also Bera MP, said the minister should own up to the mistake and not point fingers at others.
“Everything that happens in the ministry, the minister should take full responsibility because he is its head. Not accuse the secretary-general.”
On Friday, secretary-general Mohd Sallehhuddin Hassan was transferred to the Public Service Department (PSD).
Yesterday, The Malaysian Insight reported on Sallehhuddin’s transfer was after his alleged involvement in a RM1.4 billion tender exercise.
A government source said the move happened a day after MCA president Wee Ka Siong highlighted in Parliament the ministry’s award of a direct contract worth RM1.4 billion to Nafas.
Ismail Sabri said the reason given by the minister that Salahuddin did not know about the open tender made by the secretary-general is unacceptable and that the chief secretary to the government and PSD director-general should reconsider their decision.
“It is impossible for the minister not to know about the open tender made by the secretary-general.
“Unless the officer didn’t do the work or the minister didn’t do his work because he doesn’t know what is happening in his own ministry.
“In this case, the minister should be replaced.
“We (opposition) hope that the chief secretary and PSD director-general take the proper action and not to bow to pressure. If possible, reverse the decision.”
Ismail Sabri said such an action shows that the ministry is just finding a scapegoat to shift the blame to save the minister.
“When they make a mistake, they look for a scapegoat. This time, a government servant is sacrificed.” – November 26, 2019.
Comments
Posted 4 years ago by Teruna Kelana · Reply
Posted 4 years ago by Chee yee ng · Reply
Posted 4 years ago by Ty Tiko · Reply
Posted 4 years ago by James Wong · Reply
Posted 4 years ago by Mo Salleh · Reply
2. Would the award of contract require the endorsement or approval of the minister?
3. Would there be documentation and records to show such a transaction took place and reported to the minister in weekly/fortnightly basis?
4. Is there lack of transparency in the conduct by the minister?
These are the questions that should be raised with the minister and regulatory authorities
Posted 4 years ago by Kampung Boy · Reply
Posted 4 years ago by Lipdah Lia · Reply
Posted 4 years ago by Mokhzani Mohamad · Reply