Open letter to Dr Mahathir Mohamad


DEAR Tun,

Many of my friends who are readers of Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s blog have contacted me for clarification regarding Dr Mahathir’s latest entry, “Dear Mr Johari” on the issue of speculative foreign exchange transaction.

At first, I told them that I have already said enough about the subject matter and I do not want to prolong the discussion on this issue, especially since there is already an independent police team investigating this matter.

The subject of foreign-exchange activities can sometimes be too technical a subject for the ordinary man on the street to understand, particularly in relation to the role of Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) in the management of the country’s international reserves.

However, I felt it best that I try to close the discussion by putting the matter in simple perspective for ease of understanding.

It is important for the public at large to understand the difference between speculative foreign exchange and orderly management of the foreign-exchange market.

Speculative foreign-exchange activity, to put it in simpler words, is a kind of “gambling” with the hope of quick returns.

The orderly management of foreign-exchange market, however, is very much different in that it is a facilitation of liquidity by BNM to market participants in the country to mitigate imbalances with respect to the ringgit’s supply and demand in the market.

To put the matter in perspective, it was highlighted in an internal audit report prepared by BNM’s internal Auditors dated January 21, 1994 that the foreign exchange operation division of the banking department in BNM was involved in voluminous foreign-exchange trading activities, so much so that the monthly maturing buy and sell foreign-exchange transactions which amounted to an average of RM140 billion in 1992 had increased to a staggering RM750 billion in 1993.

The substantial portion of such transactions was speculative in nature and did not reflect BNM’s mandate to maintain orderly condition of the foreign exchange market as per Section 4 of the Central Bank of Malaysia Ordinance 1958.

The said internal audit report also highlighted that the magnitude of such foreign-exchange speculative transactions was considered excessive given that the shareholders’ fund of BNM was only RM4.4 billion and the country’s international reserves were merely RM43.98 billion at that material time.

These speculative activities caused BNM to suffer foreign-exchange transaction losses amounting to RM31.5 billion during the period under review.

The audit report also stated that the voluminous speculative foreign-exchange trading activities that the central bank had undertaken during that time were carried out by the foreign exchange division of the banking department, headed by its then adviser or manager, Nor Mohamed Yakcop, who later became the minister of finance II.

Because of the scale of the speculative foreign-exchange losses, the government was forced to transfer its shares in Telekom and Tenaga Nasional Berhad to BNM at the nominal value of RM1 per share and these shares were immediately revalued at RM22.10 and RM19.30 per share for Telekom and TNB respectively.

In addition, BNM had to dispose of its Malaysia Airlines shares to a third party at RM8 per share and MISC (Malaysian International Shipping Corporation) shares at RM10 per share to Retirement Fund Inc to realise the gain.

If these speculative foreign exchange losses were not real, the government would not have taken these drastic actions to cover the BNM losses at that material time.  

BNM and the country have since come a long way, particularly in instituting the necessary reforms and check and balance with regard to its foreign-exchange forward-transaction activities.

As a result of these reforms, despite volatility of capital flows and the ringgit in the recent period, our economy continues to remain resilient and BNM’s ability to safeguard the financial and economic stability remains uncompromised.

In fact, our international reserves continues to strengthen ever since and as at end November 2017, the reserves amounted to US$101.9 billion and were able to support 7.5 months of retained imports. I have said enough on this subject and if understanding of the truth is not the objective of the discussion, then there is nothing much I can say on this.

I wish Tun and family the very best of health and a very Happy New Year and may the new year be peaceful and prosperous for all Malaysians. – December 26, 2017.

* Johari Abdul Ghani is finance minister II.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments


  • Johari is an idiot or care less he does not address Najib's stealing anyone would pay much attention anything else he says true or false. Must be nice to have a job that is meaningless but still geycredt from the boss.

    Posted 8 years ago by Bigjoe Lam · Reply

    • Try and go against your boss and see what happens. One can only curse behind his back and nothing else. It happens to all of us.

      Posted 8 years ago by Malaysian First · Reply

  • "Because of the scale of the speculative foreign-exchange losses, the government was forced to transfer its shares in Telekom and Tenaga Nasional Berhad to BNM at the nominal value of RM1 per share and these shares were immediately revalued at RM22.10 and RM19.30 per share for Telekom and TNB respectively.
    In addition, BNM had to dispose of its Malaysia Airlines shares to a third party at RM8 per share and MISC (Malaysian International Shipping Corporation) shares at RM10 per share to Retirement Fund Inc to realise the gain."--Johari, Finance Minister II

    Thank you Mr Johari for telling us, Malaysians, that the BNM was involved in gambling in 1993-94 and

    Posted 8 years ago by Meng Kow Loh · Reply

    • the government lost 31.5 billion in the process. As stated, the loss was not paper loss as the BN government reported back then. Since 1993, it is still the BN that is in government and the government has kept this loss a secret. The news is finally out because of RCI and because the key players in the gambling activity are now in the opposition parties. It would appear therefore RCI has been used not to find out the truth, and to learn from mistakes so long as the key persons involved are in the government. The whole world is talking about 1MDB, and many bankers in Singapore are jailed for participating in banking activities associated with 1MDB, while US has named MO1 as the culprit in misappropriating 1MDB funds. The PM has full power over 1MDB, and he could very well be deceived in all the dealing which attracted investigations overseas. (if you believe it!). Why then is not RCI called to investigate 1MDB while the PM is in office and give him a chance to clear his name? Are we to await PH government to call for RCI!

      Note for the IT people: the COMMENT button blocks the view and caused the unfinished comment above. Can that button be moved to outside the comment block?

      Posted 8 years ago by Meng Kow Loh · Reply