Unilateral child conversion an assault on families


THE Association for Community and Dialogue is concerned about the proposed amendment to Selangor laws that would remove the requirement for both parents’ consent to convert an underage child to Islam, making the consent of just the mother or father sufficient.

If this proposed amendment goes through, it will be an assault on the well-being of families. One wonders why such amendments are given prominence in the current precarious political context. There is already much turmoil emerging from the sex video scandal and khat issues.

Understanding the larger context of how the conversion bill issue emerged, it is obvious that there is vested interest at play, or the deep state trying to break up the Pakatan Harapan government, knowing well that there are frictions with regard to matters related to Malay rights and Islam, and how these could be capitalised on in the power struggle between PH factions, and by the opposition, which is seeking to seize every opportunity to wrest control.

The Federal Court has declared the unilateral conversion of minors as unconstitutional. In any civilised society, such a ruling is beyond politics and must be respected, with new laws formulated in line with the judgment to ensure compliance with the federal constitution. This is for the common good of the nation. In this country, however, there seems to be an effort to define the constitution in an exclusive manner through the prism of religious ideology.

If the US, a predominantly Christian nation, decides on the unilateral conversion of Muslim children through marriage, will ethno-religious leaders in this country accept it? It is obvious that Malay-Muslim politicians lack the courage to apply justice when it comes to their own religion, instead playing up ethno-religious sentiments that could tear the very fabric of our society.

Furthermore, the unilateral conversion of minors is not just about the legality or technicalities of such conversions. It is also about the well-being of families that have broken up due to failed marriages, with dire consequences facing the children in such situations. One wonders how religion could be used as a tool to break up families.

Therefore, the Association for Community and Dialogue humbly appeals to the Selangor menteri besar to withdraw the proposed amendment. The maxim of “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” should be the guiding principle to resolve this issue.

The unilateral conversion of minors is an assault on families. – August 9, 2019.

* Ronald Benjamin is Association for Community and Dialogue secretary.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments


  • When politicians have their backs to the wall and no way out, they tends to lash out by creating chaos (in the Malaysian context, its always about race and religion) hoping unforeseen and unexpected consequences will go in their favour.

    Posted 6 years ago by Malaysian First · Reply

  • As long as we have the likes of Mahatiris and Anwaris in the government there is no end to the racial , religious and cultural miseries. Both this leaders have taught and inculcate to all these minons during their time in the 80s and 90s on the Malay agenda which are now morphed into something that is uncontrollable. At no expenses spared and no tolerance given and not even a discussion either but insidiously implemented with out a care of riling up others. Diplomacy is not a solution but affirmative actions to prevent and stop the bullying. .

    Posted 6 years ago by Lee Lee · Reply

  • '...or the deep state trying to break up the Pakatan Harapan government...'

    What 'deep state'?

    Or you mean, the Sgor MB who wants to introduce the legislation, is part of the deep-state, too?

    So, why are we assuming that it's only the civil service components that make up this, 'deep-state'?

    Posted 6 years ago by Rock Hensem · Reply