Putrajaya ‘never took the trouble to explain ICERD’


Asila Jalil

Suhakam chairman Razali Ismail says the government should have done better explaining the ICERD convention to the public and not ram it down their throats. – The Malaysian Insight pic by Nazir Sufari, December 10, 2018.

PUTRAJAYA never took the trouble to explain to the public what the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) was all about, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) said.

Its failure to educate citizens about the anti-discrimination treaty led to the government’s U-turn on earlier announcements that it would ratify the convention next year.

Suhakam chairman Razali Ismail said the Pakatan Harapan government should have done better explaining the convention to the public and allaying concerns that it would jeopardise the special constitutional position of the Malays and Islam.

“The government has never taken the trouble. They should. They thought they could tell the people (just) like that,” he told The Malaysian Insight on the sidelines of Suhakam’s Human Rights Day 2018 celebration in Petaling Jaya yesterday. 

Anti-ICERD protesters at Saturday's rally fear that ICERD will jeopardise the privileges of the Malays and special position of Islam. – The Malaysian Insight pic by Afif Abd Halim, December 10, 2018.

Suhakam commissioner Mah Weng Kwai also agreed that the government could have done more to disseminate correct information about ICERD to the public.

“A little more could have been done at an appropriate time because, mind you, this thing blew up suddenly and became a hot topic within a short period of time. 

“Let these emotions and all these feelings settle down a bit, then we can talk rationally. Communications could have been better,” Mah told The Malaysian Insight. 

The crux of the protests against ICERD was that ratifying the treaty would equalise the special position of the Malays and Islam with other races and religions, and hence destroy the privileges of the majority ethnic group, the Malay rulers and Islam.

The backlash came after Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department P. Waytha Moorthy said in Parliament in October that Putrajaya intended to ratify the treaty next year. 

Prior to that, Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad only said Malaysia “pledged to ratify all remaining core UN instruments related to the protection of human rights” when addressing the United Nations General Assembly in late September. 

Dr Mahathir also mentioned that this would not be “easy” for Malaysia because of its multi-ethnic and multi-religious composition.

“We will accord space and time for all to deliberate and to decide freely based on democracy,” he said at the UN.

Suhakam commissioner Mah Weng Kwai (left) says the commission will hold workshops to explain to the public the importance of ICERD. – The Malaysian Insight pic by Nazir Sufari, December 10, 2018.

Waytha Moorthy’s announcement stirred outcry and triggered calls from Malay-Muslim groups for his resignation, and culminated on Saturday in a street rally that drew 55,000 Malay participants.

The rally was held despite the Prime Minister’s Department stating on November 24 that Malaysia would not proceed with ratifying the convention.

Mah said Suhakam will be holding workshops and discussions to create awareness on ICERD and to explain why it is an important treaty.

“ICERD is for the elimination of racial discrimination. In my opinion, it does not by any stretch of the imagination infringe on Article 153 (of the federal constitution) and nobody is questioning special rights and special privileges. It will all remain intact,” he said. 

Razali also said he was hopeful that ministers would address the fears Malay-Muslims had about the treaty.

In his speech at the opening of the event yesterday, he said people should not be worried because the special position of the Malays, “which allegedly would be abolished, are clearly enshrined in our federal constitution and will continue to be preserved.”

Article 153 touches on the special position of the Malays and Bumiputeras, giving the Yang di-Pertuan Agong the power to safeguard these interests as well as that of other communities, such as in the form of quotas and scholarships. – December 10, 2018.  


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments


  • agreed

    Posted 5 years ago by Lan Lan · Reply

  • Agreed. The explanation should gave been done in order for the Rakyat to understand the issue. Our minister choose to be quite and deaf. This is not good for now and future.

    Posted 5 years ago by It's me GR · Reply

  • Yes, although the PM had agreed to ratify the remaining human rights accords, the Minister should have followed the basic approach when introducing the matter to the general public.
    1. Create Awareness & Educate the Oublic about ICERD
    - go to all the states, have forums and discussion, Q&A with community leaders
    - explain how it will be done
    - explain the impact of the ratification on the various races, religions, country, monarch, etc
    - appoint a secretariat for each state to manage the issues & Q&A, thereafter
    2. Launch the Ratification of ICERD programme, national level.
    3. Pass the Accord.
    The minister should have been more sensitive when dealing with matters that could be sensitive in nature or that can be exploited by parties.
    He should have thought this through or sought the advise from senior ministers before opening his mouth about ratification of the ICERD.
    Hope he has learnt a very costly lesson!
    What Suhakam Chairman Razali said is spot-on!!

    Posted 5 years ago by TTs Take · Reply