PAKATAN Harapan (PH) is walking a political tightrope in the Seafield Sri Maha Mariamman temple issue and how they handle the situation could determine if they would lose more Malay support, said political analysts.
Although they have shouted themselves hoarse claiming it is not a racial issue, the sentiment on the ground tells a different story, they told The Malaysian Insight.
The political analysts, however, said it was a good move by the PH state government not to buy the controversial piece of land in Subang Jaya and hand it over to the temple, as suggested by several Indian ministers.
They added such a move would have been unpopular among the Malays who are already complaining that the race is being sidelined by the new federal government in the appointment of several non-Malays to key positions in Putrajaya.

Ilham Center executive director Mohd Azlan Zainal told The Malaysian Insight that based on what they have seen, support of the Malays for PH is still lagging.
“PH has yet to totally win over the minds of the Malay voters,” he said.
“And although the government’s narrative is that the temple attack and issues surrounding it is not racial in nature, we feel the grassroots will look at it as a racial issue.”
Azlan added that the support among the Malays for PH was low because the pact was not seen as being a strong guardian of the Malay race.
“It is not just the Selangor state government. At federal level too, the Malay support is not satisfactory,” Azlan said.
“For the Malays, what has been apparent in the seven months of the PH administration is that there have not been any moves to regain the Malay support.
“In fact, ministries which used to take care of the Malays in the previous administration, have now been sidelined.”
Ilham Centre in a survey after the 14th general election found that PH only received 17% of the Malay support in Peninsular Malaysia although they managed to defeat Barisan Nasional to take over federal power.
The survey found that PAS had 35% of Malay support while Umno/BN secured 46%.

Sentiments on the ground was that the PH government continued to lose the Malay support even after taking over Putrajaya, largely due to its more open and liberal policies.
Most recently, Putrajaya had to backtrack from agreeing to ratify the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) following strong objections from Malay groups, including from parties within PH, and from PAS and Umno.
The incident early on Monday morning saw a group of about 50 Malay men attacking the temple with the intention to secure the land for the developer, One City Development Sdn Bhd.
This turned into a riot, and the following day, thousands of Indians gathered to defend the temple, and in the process vandalised a building which houses the developer’s office.
Scores were injured, including a fireman who was beaten up by a mob on the second night. Many cars were torched and the temple suffered damages as well. More than 40 people have been arrested but none have been charged yet.

The root cause of the problem was that devotees had refused to relocate the temple despite agreeing previously in a court consent judgment.
Indian ministers from PH have said that one of the ways to overcome this problem is for the state government to take over the land and hand it to the temple. Selangor Menteri Besar Amirudin Shari, however has rejected this, saying that it would be costly and would set a bad precedent.
Merdeka Centre director Ibrahim Suffian meanwhile said majority of the people disagreed with the idea of the state acquiring the land from the developer for the temple.
He said such a move would also set a precedent where the state in future would have to adhere to pressure based on race and religious grounds.

“It is not just the Malays who would object to this. PH supporters too would not agree as they see this as the PH government ignoring the rule of law.
“In this context, I think the state government’s decision was not only based on the Malay sentiments but also to recognise the wishes of PH supporters,” Ibrahim told The Malaysian Insight.
He said such a move would have also ignored a court ruling on the issue which was for the temple to relocate while the developer fulfills certain conditions, which they have.
“Ignoring the court ruling would erode the respect of the judiciary,” he said, adding it would make a mockery of PH’s strong stand on the rule of law policy.
As for now, it is status quo. The temple has managed to get an interim injunction to stop the developer from relocating the house of worship until the matter is heard again in court on January 11. – December 1, 2018.
Comments
Posted 7 years ago by Gabriel Chelliah · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Lipdah Lia · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Lipdah Lia · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Lawman will · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Tanahair Ku · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Lee Lee · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Lee Lee · Reply
Everyone took it as it is without bother to look into the gazetted reports.
It's mathematically flaw and didn't make any sense at all.
Posted 7 years ago by OOI HWEI · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Shaikh karim · Reply