IN the wake of yet another unfortunate accident at a tourist destination near the limestone hills of Ipoh, as reported on April 8, I feel compelled to voice my concern regarding the safety of such locations. If I am not mistaken, there have been dozens of incidents related to limestone landscapes, many of them resulting in death.

The allure of the limestone hills is undeniable, drawing visitors from near and far. However, with each report of such incidents as the one in Ipoh, I grow more concerned for the safety of my family and the visitors. 

While I appreciate the Perak government’s temporary closure of the affected area for expert evaluation, it raises the question: Are these safety measures reactive rather than proactive? It is alarming that despite the known risks associated with limestone formations, these tourist spots are still open to the public, and we continue to build in these areas.

The statement by Perak executive council member Loh Sze Yee acknowledging the risks associated with limestone hills is a step in the right direction. However, it is disconcerting to learn that the plan is to hold consultations and produce mitigation and safety guidelines. Loh noted that limestone is more hazardous than other types of stone or granite. Therefore, it would be foolish of us to treat them the same. This oversight highlights a critical neglect to ensure the safety of our communities. We have seen several opportunities to inform ourselves of the dangers of limestone hills and stop all developments in such areas, yet the authorities do not take heed.

As a concerned citizen, I urge the authorities to prioritise community safety by thoroughly inspecting all tourist spots near limestone hills. Additionally, state officials should consider blocking future developments in those areas.

Temples and cultural sites in such areas must also pay attention to the dangers. Why can’t we evict cultural sites on safety grounds? Take the Buddhist monastery in Gunung Kanthan, for example. I recently read that the monastery is raising funds to appeal a court decision that it had no right to inhabit the area. Inhabiting limestone landscapes should not be normalised, regardless of cultural or historical significance.

Public awareness regarding the outcomes of safety evaluations and the implemented mitigation measures is crucial. The recurrence of incidents like the Banjaran Hotsprings or Gunung Cheroh tragedies prompts scrutiny of the resolution of past issues. The lack of transparency and accountability in addressing these recurring safety concerns exacerbates risks for visitors and locals alike.

Authorities should also consider empowering locals about the hazards associated with limestone formations. They should engage in community outreach and education programmes to raise awareness of these dangers. By entrusting locals and visitors with knowledge about the risks and safety protocols, we can work towards creating a safer environment for everyone. Additionally, involving local communities in safety initiatives fosters a sense of ownership and responsibility, leading to more sustainable solutions in the long run. Ultimately, safeguarding lives should be paramount, and concerted efforts from all stakeholders are necessary to achieve this goal.

While limestone formations offer breathtaking landscapes, we cannot ignore their potential dangers. We must address these concerns seriously and take proactive measures to prevent more tragedies. – April 19, 2024.

* Azlina Din reads The Malaysian Insight.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.