Ringgit meltdown – preparing for the worst


WHILE the Malaysian finance minister is busy recording TikTok videos to convince the public that the country’s economy is on solid footing, the ringgit continues to descend, putting Malaysia’s foreign debts in foreign denominations in a precarious situation. In addition, given that Malaysia has very high food imports, the food costs for many in Malaysia are expected to soar. 

Malaysia’s unbridled politicking is not helping the ringgit situation either.

Research in economics and finance over the decades established that the strongest predictors of an imminent speculative attack on a currency are the behaviour of the home country’s international reserves, the real exchange rate, domestic credit, credit of the public sector, and domestic inflation. The appearance of any of these indicators or a combination of them severely curtails the government’s ability to defend an attempt to devalue the national currency.

For instance, stagnated or depleted international reserves void the government’s capacity to maintain its currency within predetermined bounds by dumping international reserves.

Sliding exchange rate, especially in combination with the belief that this trend will continue (based on fundamentals), informs speculators that the government of a targeted country would not opt for the strategy of aggressive borrowing in foreign currencies to stem speculative attack as long-term depreciation will only increase the costs of repayments of both the principal and interest rates.

Expansion of the domestic credit, as well as credit to the public, makes intervention through interest rate increase implausible option as doing so may push a large proportion of individuals and companies into default and send turmoil through the entire financial system.

This strategy of currency defeat is also not an option in case of rising domestic inflation, as it will undoubtedly send domestic inflation to new highs.

When the above conditions are met, the target country is basically “trapped” or “ripe” for a successful speculative currency attack.

Things have changed since Emir Research published its warning on the potential ringgit slide, but not in the best direction — the updated figures are as follows.

Dwindling international reserves

Malaysia’s foreign currency reserves fell precipitously below the psychological US$100 (RM455) billion mark in sync with the soaring USD/MYR rate (weakening ringgit) post the announcement of the Federal Reserve on the rise of US interest rates, with the latest level reported by BNM at US$96.1 billion while total gross international reserves stood at US$108.2 billion as of August 30, 2022 (Figure 1).

Low foreign reserves (that are potentially sliding lower) is critical for a country that highly depends on food imports (RM63.3 billion in 2021). And, given the high dependency of local food supply chains on intermediate foreign inputs leading to the possible closure of local agribusinesses due to decades-high inflation raging through global supply chains coupled with the persistent absence of credible food security strategy to date, Malaysia’s dependency on food imports is likely to grow even higher. Sadly, Deputy Agriculture and Food Industry Minister has already warned about such a possibility earlier this year.

Meanwhile, a country’s foreign currency reserves can decline not only on possible forex market interventions but also on managing foreign capital outflows and serving foreign-denominated debt, which becomes increasingly burdensome with the depreciating home currency.

Interest rate hikes

It might sound unthinkable that in a situation of a fragile economy, just beginning to recover after the Covid-19 pandemic and facing severe challenges due to international supply chain disruptions authorities, could introduce an interest rate hike. 

Nevertheless, following the global jihad on inflation hysteria, Malaysia has seen three consecutive interest rate hikes from May to September. After all, the interest rate hike is also believed to ward off currency depreciation. Should the ringgit be stronger fundamentally, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) could hold the lower rates longer, therefore, providing more breathing space to the local economic sector due to Malaysia’s high fuel subsidies which can somewhat suppress the headline inflation.

However, given the specifics of the current global and local situation, interest rate hikes can do very little to fight either inflation or ringgit depreciation. 

Inflation, much of which stems from energy and other supply shocks, would not be resolved by tightening the money supply. Also, monetary policy works with a lag! It first triggers losses and contraction in the financial sector, which then transfers to the real economic sector and eventually results in massive unemployment outlays. Is Malaysia’s fragile economy ready to pay this high price?

Also, it is more logical to expect even more inflation in the immediate term as greater credit costs would leave no choice for the local businesses but raise their prices. 

At the same time, ringgit depreciation is primarily driven by investors’ perception of the country’s weak fundamentals, such as colossal trust deficit due to rampant corruption at all levels, both in the private and public sector; absence of clear strategic direction for the national development (take, for example, the catastrophic situation with food security); shrinking complexity of the domestic economy; massive outflow abroad and domestic lack of local talents; and unbridled politicking as a final nail.

Notably, political instability is another well-established predictor of currency selloff. Figure 1 above clearly illustrates how politics and corruption have contributed to the ringgit’s woes—the ringgit’s slide against the dollar appear to be highly synced with the slightest signals of political instability.

However, Malaysian politicians, being entirely out of touch with the rakyat reality, are voicing the possibility of a general election, and during the monsoon season, too, the effects of which are predicted to be highly adverse and massive.

Meanwhile, the USD/MYR pair has clearly broken all the important technical levels to watch. And, technically, nothing is stopping it now from reaching as high as RM5 per US$1 (Figure 2), probably, finding an intermediate resistance around the 4.8 level unless there is a fundamental reversal in form of credible policymaking and lessened politicking. 

Nevertheless, finance minister Tengku Zafrul hastens to assure the public that there is no economic crisis in sight.

The GDP has grown for the last three consecutive quarters – “by 3.6% in the fourth quarter of 2021, 5.0% in the first quarter of 2022 and 8.9% in the second quarter” – he stressed, forgetting to specify that these growth rates were on extremely low base (Figure 3). During these same quarters, a year back, the pandemic and floods were raging in Malaysia to the extent that the state of emergency was declared with never-ending rounds of lockdowns. And only in January, the real sector finally got a chance to breathe, judging by the abnormally surging business credit in that month alone.

The same lower base is also the reason that “for the first seven months of this year alone, wholesale and retail trade was valued 19% higher than last year” – another “positive indicator” mentioned by the finance minister in the same TikTok statement. 

The finance minister has further emphasised that exporters will be happy about ringgit depreciation in a book-like statement, probably, without having a clear representation of how exactly this would happen. 

If this is about weakening ringgit stimulating demand for Malaysia’s exports, then we must also understand what will take to expand the production capacity to fulfil that growing demand which in turn is dependent on the availability of at least — if we ignore innovation, in line with the 1980s to 2000s solutions — simple factors of production (land, labour, capital, and entrepreneurship) among which specialists and capital will be the most critical for Malaysia.

Malaysia has been experiencing a severe shortage of highly technically skilled individuals across the industries, including electronics, unless, of course, the finance minister had the low-skilled imported labour in his mind.

As for credit availability, locally, BNM has hiked the interest rate by 75 basis points since May 2022, discouraging business expansion. At the same time, the depreciating ringgit makes it unattractive for foreign investors to invest in local production as they take their profits in foreign currencies unless it is a foreign-denominated debt which exposes Malaysia to other risks of depreciating ringgit.

Malaysia’s ringgit depreciating less against the US$ than other currencies in the region and even developed countries was another point by the Minister. 

However, we should not forget that those developed countries are among the most stricken by rising fuel prices. At the same time, we should not leave out of the picture the fact that Malaysia’s ringgit depreciated against US$ more than our closest neighbour Singapore or even other export-oriented countries such as India, Indonesia or Vietnam (Figure 4). 

Speaking of ringgit appreciation against some of the currencies, we should not ignore the fact that among these countries, if we talk about major trading partners (Figure 4), are mainly those with whom Malaysia has a positive trade balance.

In the end, although the finance minister and other avid proponents of ringgit depreciation accuse their opponents of looking at only one side of the coin, they themselves appear to suffer from myopia, cherry-picking and making broad book-like brush-stroke statements while living numerous parameters out of the equation.

The only credible way to simultaneously fight inflation and currency depreciation is to develop a larger domestic market with less and less reliance on both imports and a seemingly supportive commodity-exporter position. 

Expanding the domestic food market with completely localised supply chains should be the government’s priority as its potential spillover effects will deepen and complicate other domestic economic sectors, including high technologies. 

Perhaps, only those who welcome colonisation, foreign and local, in their country could think of “more benefits” to a depreciating home currency in the modern 4IR world.

And, perhaps, even Najib could have been a better finance minister.

However, it would also be unfair to say that the finance minister is not doing anything. On the contrary, he appears to be very busy persuading the telcos into the questionable DNB single wholesale network model — his apparent “flagship project” for nation building.

The future is indeed bleak.

* Dr Rais Hussin is Emir Research CEO.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments


  • Because of having plenty of crooks and idiots as leaders in all sectors of society.

    Consequence of NOT choosing the best based on merit, intelligence, integrity, hard work, etc. but on NEP guidelines.

    Wait for when 10yr. US. Treasury bond reaches 4%. The ringgit will be @#$_&!!!

    Posted 2 months ago by Malaysian First · Reply

  • Article is extremely biased just by reading it. A factual article should not include assumptions, feelings of the writer but this article is riddled with them.

    Posted 2 months ago by Ordinary Malaysian · Reply

  • Writer is contradicting him/herself, want BNM to lower interest rate but at the same time want higher MYR to USD rate. Why USD higher relative to all currency? Is because US fed increase their interest rate to tackle inflation in the US. This caused investors to pullout their investment from other countries in USD denomination (causing higher USD demand thus causing the rise of value) and investing in the US market instead to enjoy the higher interest rate. Simple analogy, you have money and want to invest, Bank 'A' give interest of 3.25% and Bank 'M' give 2.50% where will you invest your money at? If you have money in Bank 'B' you will definitely withdraw it and dump it into Bank 'A'. So what Bank 'M' do to counter this from happen? is to increase their interest comparable to Bank 'A'. That explain the contradiction is was saying.

    Posted 2 months ago by Augustus Edwin · Reply