Support of majority of MPs is what matters


MARCH 29, 1979 remains as one of the most dramatic dates in the United Kingdom’s (UK) political history of the last century. On that day, prime minister James Callaghan lost a motion of no confidence by 311-310.

Callaghan was said to be “extremely well qualified to become prime minister”. Prior to taking office, he had held the positions of chancellor of the exchequer, foreign secretary and home secretary. When he became Prime Minister in April 1976, he was the only individual to have held all four of the “great offices of state”.

But 1979 was exceptionally difficult for the UK. There was widespread industrial unrest. The winter of 1978-79 was called the “winter of discontent” as trade union strikes grounded the kingdom’s public services to a halt. It was against this economic backdrop that the vote of no confidence was held. 

On the night of the motion of no confidence, a difference of one vote was all it took to make history: the ayes were 311 and the nays were 310.

And so fell the minority government of Callaghan – a Labour leader. The 1979 general election was called and held. It ushered in 18 years of Conservative government.

Callaghan had the support of his cabinet but on that historic night, he lost the support of 11 Scottish National Party MPs who supported the no-confidence motion. Callaghan famously quipped the SNP MPs were turkeys voting for Christmas.

Like how heart-breaking and bitter it was for England to lose out 2:3 to Italy on penalty kicks, it was similarly bitter for the Labour party that the minority government it led could fall overnight by a single vote. Many Labour members have never forgiven the 11 SNP MPs.

But this is what parliamentary democracy is all about. The governments are not directly elected by the people but are formed on the support of Parliament. In other words, on the basis of parliamentary confidence. (See Elliot W. Bulmer, Government Formation and Removal Mechanisms (2017) available online at https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/government-formation-and-removal-mechanisms)

In a parliamentary democracy, the prime minister is not directly elected by the citizens, but is normally nominated or appointed – as the case is in Malaysia – by the head of state -– the Agong in Malaysia. However, the head of state may not have very much discretion in designating a prime minister, since the first principle of parliamentary democracy is that the government must be chosen on the basis of parliamentary confidence.

Confidence simply means support. According to Bulmer, a government is said to enjoy the confidence of Parliament when a majority of the MPs politically support the government and give consent to its appointment and continuance in office.

A formal expression of the support and consent is the vote of confidence in Parliament. Not the unanimous support of the cabinet.

Much like “a statement from a component party that forms the existing government” is no clear indication to prove the prime minister has lost the confidence of the majority of MPs [see the attorney-general’s press statement as reported https://www.themalaysianinsight.com/s/326105], so is a unanimous support of the cabinet a clear indication that the prime minister has the confidence of the majority of MPs.

Support of the majority of MPs is what matters. – July 15, 2021.

* Hafiz Hassan reads The Malaysian Insight.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments