Is Penjana Kerjaya creating skilled jobs?

THE National Economic Recovery Plan (Penjana) introduced a financial incentive to employers to improve recruitment of local workers called Penjana Kerjaya. This programme is to benefit 300,000 fresh graduates and unemployed with an allocation of RM1.5 billion, which will open up job opportunities for those affected by the current economic crisis.

Although this recruitment policy is seen as a positive move, its framework and implementation need to be more thorough so that it really helps youth and graduates..

Based on a statement by Finance Minister Tengku Zafrul Tengku Abd Aziz, 129,169 job vacancies have been advertised by Penjana Kerjaya since July 13. For the “MyFuture Job” programme, 159,591 applications have been received. However, only 5,300 individuals have been employed through the programme.  

This number is still small compared with the unemployment rate in May, which stood at 5.3%, or 826,100 individuals, and 5% in April (778,000). This means those who have acquired jobs comprise less than 10%, after the government allocated the massive economic stimulus package.

This raises some questions about whether Penjana Kerjaya is able at all to create a competitive economic environment post-Covid-19. 

First, since employers use Penjana Kerjaya funds to employ graduates for low-skilled jobs, it will create more low-paying jobs for graduates and jobseekers, which can lead to a skills mismatch

Second, there is uncertainty as to whether employees hired under the Penjana Kerjaya will be laid off if this programme is not continued. Employers are expected to continue thinking of reducing operating costs as economic recovery is expected to take several years. This is based on the forecast of the Statistics Department that the labour market in May and beyond will be affected as companies tend to restructure the size of its workforce to ease financial burdens.

Third, whether individuals who participate in the apprenticeship programme under a Penjana Kerjaya are guaranteed job opportunities after completion of training. If apprentices are not absorbed in the industry, it is also a huge loss for the industry as those who are experienced and skilled are not given the opportunity to secure a job after months of training.  

Penjana Kerjaya should be the best platform for employers and governments to create a competitive economic environment, offering skilled jobs at a decent wage. This should be an effort to create low-wage job opportunities that was already a problem even before the Covid-19 crisis.

The main focus of Penjana Kerjaya should be on creating jobs. Employers have a responsibility to create more high-skilled jobs with decent wages and to take advantage of the Penjana Kerjaya initiative. So, how can the government ensure that the private-public partnership is enhanced through the Penjana Kerjaya initiative? 

Because the government provides incentives to employers who hire local workers and provides a training allowance of RM4,000 to one employee, employers have room to invest in automation and high-productivity economic activities.

It is unreasonable to have employers still relying on a low-wage economic environment and foreign workers while their businesses receive government assistance to increase productivity and boost stability of the company. 

This will add value to Penjana Kerjaya as a key to creating more skilled jobs with a decent salary for young people. For the apprenticeship programme, it is better if the government formulates a policy to ensure that this group is absorbed by the employer or industry as permanent employees after training. 

According to the latest Penjana Kerjaya projections, only four out of 10 unemployed or new graduates enjoy Penjana Kerjaya incentives. Therefore, the government needs to increase the injection of funds for Penjana Kerjaya to at least RM3 billion to accommodate at least more than 600,000 unemployed and graduates.

These funds will prove the government’s commitment to create high-skilled jobs with decent wages in sectors such as health, creative industry, innovation and green technology.  

Implementation-wise, Penjana Kerjaya should be extended at least two years so that it can offset the rising unemployment rate in the country that is expected to last at least two years, or until a Covid-19 vaccine is found.

The good news is that the Covid-19 crisis has given the government and employers the opportunity to look for other avenues to secure the future of employees, especially youth and fresh graduates.

Thus, Penjana Kerjaya should be the driving force for a competitive economic restructuring, especially for young Malaysians who have been greatly affected in the challenging period that we live in today. – July 25, 2020.

* Fakhrurrazi Rashid is research coordinator for progressive think-tank Research for Social Advancement.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight.

Sign up or sign in here to comment.


  • "...... National Economic Recovery Plan (Penjana) ....... to benefit 300,000 fresh graduates and unemployed ........ 159,591 applications have been received. However, only 5,300 individuals have been employed through the programme ....... who have acquired jobs comprise less than 10%, after the government allocated the massive economic stimulus package......."

    Don't blame on Penjana Kerjaya (cf Talentcorp). The fault lies on the government and its policies, past and present.

    A consequence of our UN-meritocratic education system (emphasis on quota/quantity rather than on quality) and UN-meritocratic and NON-free market economy (with heavy handed government interference and discriminatory policies).

    On the first point, the watered down education coupled with the intake of low quality tertiary students produced many graduates that are UNFIT for the current knowledge based economy so employers are hesitant to employ them. Its a wastage of taxpayers' funds.

    However, who knows, if the government raised our education level to be on par with the developed world (or even surpassing them) and placed students according to their true abilities, there may be more vacancies than unemployed. Also there will be less brain drain which will provide jobs for future generations.

    On the second point, FDI (and even local businessmen) would rather locate to other countries, especially those that rectified ICERD, which promises a level playing field to local or foreign investors alike, and NO discrimination on employers and employees which gives them quality manpower and a free hand in recruitment and operations. Thus these (ICERD) countries reduces unemployment and increases tax revenues and GDP.

    Remember that during Mahathir's first tenure, a Mitsubishi manager criticized the un-meritocratic and non-free market ways Proton was run and predicted it will go bankrupt. His contract was promptly terminated but was eventually proven right. Proton had to be saved by the government numerous times, wasting BILLIONS of the citizens' money.

    Posted 1 week ago by Malaysian First · Reply