Najib admits to being in contact with Jho Low on funds in his accounts


Former prime minister Najib Razak has admitted in court that he had direct contact with fugitive businessman Low Taek Jho over the funds in his AmBank accounts. – The Malaysian Insight pic by Seth Akmal, January 9, 2020.

FORMER prime minister Najib Razak told the high court today he had been in contact with fugitive businessman Low Taek Jho or Jho Low on “a few occasions” over the operation of his AmBank personal accounts.

Najib, 67, was answering a series of questions from ad hoc prosecutor V. Sithambaram in relation to a thread of BlackBerry Messenger (BBM) chats between then AmBank relationship manager Joanna Yu and Low in 2014 that seemed to show that Low was involved in ensuring that there was always sufficient funds in Najib’s accounts. 

Sithambaram read out the chats between Yu and Low on the balance amount in Najib’s three accounts and the need to ensure there were sufficient funds for Najib to issue cheques. He also referred the Pekan MP to the bank statements that corresponded to the accounts.

The bank statements stated personal purchases to the tune of €763,500 (RM3.28 million) made by Najib at a Swiss luxury jewellery store in Italy.

Sithambaram: This is clear that Low was making sure that you have enough money to issue cheques. Is this correct, sir? 

Najib: It would appear so.

Sithambaram: It is clear that Low was making sure all transactions were honoured, correct sir?

Najib: Yes.

Sithambaram: And from these transactions and conversations, Low verified the accounts to the bank for the purpose of ensuring sufficient funds for you to use your credit cards and issue cheques, correct sir?

Najib: Yes.

Sithambaram: I put it to you, these BBM chats would show that Low was on some occasions in contact with you, to ensure the cards and cheques were honoured.

Najib: It was through Azlin Alias (Najib’s former principal private secretary).

Sithambaram: But on some occasions with Low?

Najib: A few occasions. On very few occasions. 

Sithambaram: Few occasions, he liaised with you?

Najib: Yes.

Yesterday, Najib testified that he was kept informed of the status of his personal bank accounts mostly by Azlin and sometimes by SRC International Sdn Bhd chief executive officer Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil, but with Low it was only for remittance with regard to Arab donations.

Najib, however, disagreed that he had actual knowledge of the status of his three personal accounts at all times.

Sithambaram also asked Najib why he prevented former finance minister II Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah from going to Switzerland to recover the money loaned by SRC International from Retirement Fund (Incorporated) (KWAP).

Najib said the request from Husni was not formal.

Sithambaram: You would agree that SRC, as a company, seeking the Swiss government to release frozen money would not be as effective as if the government had sent a representative to secure the money?

Najib: That is debatable.

Sithambaram: This money belongs to a legitimate government pension fund. If the finance minister or the second finance minister went, it would have been more effective. I can’t imagine otherwise. Why couldn’t Husni retrieve it?

Najib: It would be more effective with a proper plan.

Sithambaram: Did you tell him to get a proper plan?

Najib: I didn’t tell him that but I wanted a proper plan.

Sithambaram: I put it to you that you didn’t want him to go and bring the funds back.

Najib: I disagree.

Najib also testified that the cabinet had not been referred to when the second SRC International loan was defaulting as the matter was already under his purview as the prime minister.

Najib is facing seven charges of misappropriating RM42 million in SRC International funds, comprising three counts of criminal breach of trust, three counts of money laundering and one count of abuse of position in relation to the SRC funds.

The hearing before Justice Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali resumes on Jan 20.

The judge reminded Najib not to discuss the case or to post any statement on social media in relation to the case as he has to continue with his testimony and that he is still under oath. – Bernama, January 9, 2020.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments