Maszlee, why, why, why…


MY initial reaction to Dr Maszlee Malik’s resignation was that it was non-issue, since there were resignations of deputy prime ministers and even sackings before this.  

It is a given that the prime minister (PM) has the discretion to advise or dismiss ministers based on performance or other reasons. Is it that Maszlee had performed so badly that he was advised to resign? 

He was attacked by a former senior minister. Apart from Dong Zong, members from a component party in Pakatan Harapan (PH) also joined the salvo. It is difficult when your partner starts shooting publicly. Maybe, the biggest salvo was from an ex-member of the Council of Eminent Persons (CEP), who said Malaysia has failed because the government, through the education ministry, has not gotten its priorities right. 

Earlier this year, there was the matriculation quota issue. Last year, he stood his ground after repeated calls and a cabinet decision to relinquish the IIUM presidency. There was also issue on Sijil Peperiksaan Bersepadu (UEC) and the latest is khat. The latter was viewed negatively by Chinese and Tamil education groups. Actually, the decision on khat was made in 2015. 

In January 2017, he published a paper, “Kafir Harbi in Malaysia: Another Path to Polarization” at the Yusof Ishak Institute. He concluded that Kafir Harbi was a term used in the past to demonise DAP for political reasons. Mutual respect and recognition of other believers and their beliefs should be kept sacred and sine qua non to ensure a harmonious and peaceful world community. 

Did he make a 180 degree turn on mutual respect?

Recent reports indicate that on several occasions, Maszlee did not heed cabinet directives and advice on issues such as khat, free internet service for schools and free breakfast programme. He also did not want to split the education and higher education portfolios. 

If it is true, why did he not heed the cabinet, why did he not listen to advice and why did he not want to split the education portfolios?

The cabinet is the highest policy-making body under our system of governance. Formulation and implementation of policies are at  ministerial level. I think it is at this level he formulated policies that are not in tandem with the wants of the cabinet.

It does not matter whether you received 100,000 signatures within one hour in an online petition to support you or the National Union of Teaching Profession (NUTP) supported you or the Parent Action Group viewed your resignation was “unfortunate”, the boss felt it is time for you to go.

You may have improved internet connectivity, set up an Independent Integrity Committee (ICC) to investigate fraud and malpractices, a free school breakfast programme, abolished examinations in Year One to Three, implemented a streamless school system, allowing all stateless and undocumented children to enrol in schools, thousands of dilapidated schools and laboratories are now safe and operational and more universities listed in the QS-World Universities Ranking (WUR) 2020 and QS Asia 2020. You may have started to look at teacher’s extraneous workload, dismantle the much-abused University and University Colleges Act (UUCA), to make technical and vocational education and training more “industry-led”, education for disabled persons and others but this is not good enough for Malaysia Baru.

Only the black shoe and khat issues grabbed news headlines. But I am encouraged that our Raja Permaisuri Agong has started to use Jawi.

What the powerful vocal groups want is more important than making sure the base or foundation is solid. It does not count whether the children are under-nourished, but they must produce results irrespective. It does not matter whether the internet connectivity is at snail’s pace and at exorbitant cost as long as the contractor carry on with the job.   

What about the Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025? There were eleven ‘shifts’ to transform the system. Shift 2 was to ensure every child is proficient in Bahasa Malaysia and English language. Shift 3 was to develop values-driven Malaysians by strengthening Islamic and Moral education and civics elements. Shift 7 was to leverage ICT to scale up quality learning and for distance and self-paced learning to expand access to high-quality teaching regardless of location or student skill level.

What was your contribution towards the above compared to the previous ministers?

Your advisers may have miscalculated the power of the cabinet and the boss. And the ICC may have created enemies.

The latest news suggested that your attempt to reopen a Saudi Arabian-backed “anti-terrorism” centre as the “straw that broke the camel’s back” which led you to return the post to ‘ayahanda’. 

So, why did you do what you did?

Many had expressed regret that the education system had been dictated by politics instead of real education issues.

For that matter, democracy is not really government by the people (supreme power) or rule of the majority. Also, there is no inherent link between the people and the cabinet or the government. “Politics is the art of the possible, the attainable - the art of the next best” - Otto von Bismarck.

What say you…

* Saleh Mohammed reads The Malaysian Insight.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments


  • The US has such a high standard of education that even universities dropouts went and founded giant companies, ie Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, etc

    But our universities GRADUATES instead work as e-hailing food deliverers and drivers (and illegal fruit pickers in Australia) ....... IN SPITE of Malaysia having an Entrepreneur Development Ministry (for Bumis only) ...

    The US aforesaid founders were prodigies in computer programming.

    Knowing this fact should have alerted Maszlee to introduce computer coding in Primary schools. Instead he went for "Khat/Jawi". Maybe his sacking is deserved!!!

    Posted 4 years ago by Malaysian First · Reply

  • I am just wondering why the PM and PH Leader Council allows such a long drag of period to sak him. Looks very fishy. The vociferous hue and cries about Maszlee incompetency and his freaky religious intentions are so blatant and yet the PM and PH could just ignore it and allow no damage control but free flow of wreck destructions into the education system. Rakyat should hold the PM accountable and responsible for condoning such destructive and malicious agenda. By the PM act of long period of indifference to the views of many and his inactions can fault not the rakyat to allude that he has mischievously allow Maszlee to introduce nonsences and made changes of non value into the Education System.. Maszlee deservingly was accorded the sack but a different angle view is that he is the fall guy and expendable as his contributions are no more significant to the self agenda of the PH Leaders

    Posted 4 years ago by Lee Lee · Reply