A POLITICALLY significant forum to discuss the Rome Statute and its related issues will be held in Kuala Lumpur tomorrow.
This forum was announced weeks ago and yet, there has not been a squeak so far to indicate that at least two of the four academics, who reportedly made a presentation to the Malay rulers at the beginning of this month, would participate in the public forum.
The other two who had declined the invite to the forum should reconsider their decision.
In their hushed presentation, the academics apparently cautioned the Malay rulers that signing the international treaty would have dire consequences for them and others as well.
This incident, as we know it, gave rise to the sudden scrapping of Putrajaya’s plan to ratify the Rome Statute.
The withdrawal from ratifying the international treaty obviously reflects badly on Malaysia, especially in the eyes of the international community. Such flippancy is frowned upon because this is not akin to changing your mind about buying a diamond ring.
Apart from the academic outfit Malaysian Academic Movement (Gerak), the National Patriots’ Association (Patriot) has also rightly urged these academics to come forward to defend their stand on this important matter in the forum, which is organised by a few civil society and academic organisations.
Surely, it does not necessitate the academics concerned to be dragged, kicking and screaming into a public debate as this would be beyond the pale.
Academic convention would expect them to take up this challenge in their stride because to engage in a debate should be part and parcel of academic life. To be clear, meeting of the minds normally does not bring about colossal head damage.
Indeed, it would be a dereliction of duty should these academics decide eventually to shy away from this forum, especially when the topic is a hot-button issue.
To reiterate, it is incumbent upon them to present and defend their position on the subject matter because their controversial justification for their criticism of the Rome Statute is of public interest and curiosity.
Similarly, it would be instructive for the public to know the arguments that would be marshalled by the opposite side, i.e. Prof Shad Saleem Faruqi and Attorney-General Tommy Thomas, regarding the Rome Statute.
A deafening silence from these four academics is not an option and neither is it elegant. In fact, such an act of stonewalling would adversely affect their academic standing and accountability.
Worse, it smudges the image of the institutions to which they’re attached, if not the reputation of all public universities as well.
The spectre of “professor kangkung” has already made its rounds through the grapevine as a result of the public conduct of these academics, a locally known derogatory buzzword for lecturers whose academic integrity is suspect and mockable.
Keeping mum would also present a bad example to their students and others who are supposed to look up to them for intellectual leadership and moral courage.
If nothing else, surely, the familiar refrain of “Untuk negara, bangsa dan agama” (For the country, race and religion) would nudge them to rise to the occasion.
Certain segments of society, especially those who are not fully aware of the role of academics, would appreciate the fact that academics are expected to challenge ideas among themselves and with others in the pursuit of truth and knowledge.
It goes a long way towards promoting academic rigour and intellectual integrity in the country if the academics concerned (and others as well) are willing to stand up and be counted. – April 26, 2019.
Comments
Posted 7 years ago by Watchdog Watchdog · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Lee Lee · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Simple Sulaiman · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Lee Lee · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Raghu Thiyagarajan · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Ravinder Singh · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by T E · Reply