THE Selangor government is asking the wrong party to return the money and land given to the Seafield Sri Maha Mariamman temple in Subang Jaya for its relocation, said the Save Seafield Temple Task Force.
Task force secretary V. K. Regu said the RM1.5 million and land title were handed over to the former temple committee under a consent judgment in 2014.
He said the current committee was not involved in the deal between the then temple chairman K. Chellapa and developer One City Development Bhd.
The issue of the relocation of the Hindu temple, which is tied to the land on which it sits, looks set to be resolved with the intervention of the Attorney-General’s Chambers. The temple is to remain and the land held in a court-administered trust.
However, as part of the deal, the temple is to return the RM1.5 million it received as compensation and a piece of land in USJ 23, Subang Jaya into which it was to move, said Selangor Menteri Besar Amirudin Shari.
This has left the task force – which manages the temple now – in a dilemma as it has neither the money nor the land title in its possession.
Regu said the documents were with Chellapa and the developer.
“We don’t know anything about the compensation and the land.

Task force member Elangovan Annamalai agreed that it was Chellapa who had received the compensation and the rights to the land.
Elangovan said it was Chellapa’s responsibility now to return the money, as it was part of the settlement suggested by Attorney-General Tommy Thomas for the handover of the temple land, which sparked riots in Seafield last month.
“If he does not want to give the money back, the developer should sue him.”
The Malaysian Insight had attempted to contact Chellapa on several occasions but calls and text messages to his handphone were never answered.
Amirudin had said the Sri Maha Mariamman temple management should return the land and the RM1.5 million in accordance with the settlement made by the attorney-general.
In Thomas’ proposed solution, One City will transfer the title of the land where the temple states to a trust administered by the High Court. One City expressed support for the settlement.
The land was awarded to One City under a consent judgment on March 11, 2014.
The Shah Alam High Court had then ruled that the four parties – the Selangor government, One City and two individuals claiming to be the temple administrators – agreed to the relocation of the temple and to return the present temple site to the owner, One City.
As part of the deal, One City agreed to deposit RM1.5 million with the temple while the Selangor government allocated a piece of land, located about 3km away, for the relocation of the temple.
The temple at USJ25, near Subang Jaya, was the scene of riots on November 26 and 27, sparked by attacks on worshippers by a group of men. Cars were torched and property damaged in the violence, believed to have been due to a dispute over the temple’s proposed relocation. – December 21, 2018.
Comments
Posted 7 years ago by Tiong Fee Chua · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Tiong Fee Chua · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Tanahair Ku · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Panchen Low · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Lee Lee · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Tanahair Ku · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Tharan Singh · Reply
Posted 7 years ago by Danial Abdullah · Reply