THE Court of Appeal has fixed October 10 to deliver the verdict on an appeal by former attorney general Mohamed Apandi Ali against the High Court’s dismissal of his RM10 million defamation lawsuit against Lim Kit Siang. 

Justice Hadhariah Syed Ismail, who chaired a three-member bench, said they needed a month’s time to do so. 

She said the court’s decision would be delivered physically in open court on October 10. 

The bench, also comprising Justices M. Gunalan and Azmi Ariffin, heard submissions today from Apandi’s counsel Rueben Mathiavaranam and lawyer Sangeet Kaur Deo who represented Lim. 

On May 23, last year, the High Court in Kuala Lumpur dismissed Apandi’s suit against the DAP veteran and the former AG subsequently filed the appeal in the Court of Appeal on May 24 last year.  

Apandi sued Lim for allegedly defaming him in an article on the 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) scandal. 

In his suit filed on July 5, 2019, Apandi claimed that on May 6, 2019, Lim had written and caused to be published an article titled “Dangerous fallacy to think Malaysia’s on the road to integrity” in Malaysiakini. 

He claimed the alleged libellous words in the article implied that he was involved in crime and had abetted in the 1MDB financial scandal, was a person with no morals and integrity, was unethical, and had abused his power when he was the AG. 

Apandi, who was the AG from July 27, 2015 to June 4, 2018 contended that the libellous words were untrue and written with the intention of tarnishing his image for cheap publicity. 

He sought aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as RM10 million in general damages, an injunction to prevent Lim and/or his agents from publishing the alleged defamatory words again and other relief deemed fit by the court.   

In today’s proceedings, Rueben submitted that Lim had made a positive assertion in his article, alleging that Apandi had aided and abetted in the IMDB scandal, and was being asked to explain why he did so. 

He said there was no evidence that showed Apandi had participated, encouraged, or assisted in the IMDB scandal and there was no ongoing investigation of Apandi’s involvement in the IMDB scandal. 

Rueben said the allegedly defamatory words that Lim had caused to be published in Malaysiakini was not protected by the defence of qualified privilege. 

Sangeet Kaur, however, argued that High Court judge Azimah Omar was correct in her findings to allow Lim’s defence of justification and qualified privilege and to dismiss Apandi’s claim against her client. 

She said Justice Azimah had carefully considered and evaluated the evidence of witnesses and there was no misdirection by her in arriving at the decision. 

Apandi was present in court today. – Bernama, September 4, 2023.