ANTI-GRAFT activist K. Sudhagaran Stanley, who was released by police last night, said his arrest is a form of intimidation to silence those who speak out on wrongdoings in the country.
He told The Malaysian Insight that he was arrested over a Facebook post on April 2 that questioned the authorities on arrests made during the movement control order, and not over a post about the defacing of murals of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in Shah Alam.
Sudhagaran said his arrest was meant to be a message for dissenting voices.
“I feel that this is intimidation, not only towards me, but in the past weeks or months against activists, those who have been called up for making statements.
“They are threatening our right to speak out on what’s not right in this country,” he said.
On Monday, Sudhagaran, who is the Penang coordinator for the Centre to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4), was arrested at 10pm at his home and taken to the Timur Laut district police headquarters.
He said the following day, officers from Bukit Aman came to Penang and took his statement.
“They (police) went to apply for a remand at the courts, but the registrar rejected it after learning what had transpired.
“So, I was released on police bail after 6pm yesterday.”
In his April 2 titled “Are we turning into a police state during the MCO period?”, Sudhagaran had questioned the arrest of 24 seminarians playing football in their seminary field in Penang on March 31, when the MCO was in force.
“The arrest of these 24 seminarians on private grounds is unnecessary and uncalled for.
“The police seem to be overreacting and victimising individuals by arresting and charging them to create fear and panic among Malaysians,” he had posted.
Sudhagaran’s lawyer said that he is being investigated under Section 4 (1) of the Sedition Act, Section 505 (b) of the Penal Code and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act.
Sudhagaran, meanwhile, expressed disbelief at the fact that simply questioning police action can leave one liable to investigation under the Sedition Act.
“If they are going to use that as sedition, then I have no clue what they are trying to do… I believe they are trying to send us a message with this intimidation and trying to scare us.”
Malaysiakini, meanwhile, reported Bukit Aman CID deputy director Mior Faridalathrash Wahid as saying that investigations into Sudhagaran’s post began a while back but due to the Covid-19 restrictions, police were only proceeding with the probe now.
Other activists have decried the way Sudhagaran was arrested at his home, saying police could have called him in to give his statement instead. – July 22, 2020.
Comments
Posted 5 years ago by Zainuddin Yusoff · Reply
The police are either ignorant of the law, or have chosen to thumb their noses at the Judiciary, and ignore specific Judicial instructions.
That is the true state of the PDRM today.
Mostly act within the law? We wonder.
Posted 5 years ago by Arul Inthirarajah · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Zainuddin Yusoff · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Rupert Lum · Reply
Posted 5 years ago by Tanahair Ku · Reply