Amid controversy, judges still hoping for more years on the job


The Malaysian Insight

Over the past few months, those who want to increase the retirement age of judges have argued that those in senior positions needed more time to put in plans to reform the judiciary. EPA pic, February 19, 2019.

THE country’s senior judges are still pushing the Mahathir administration to extend the retirement age of judges to 70 despite being caught in the middle of allegations of misconduct and fixing cases.

Sources told The Malaysian Insight that the judges were hopeful of obtaining the support of de facto Law Minister V. K. Liew for the proposal.

Liew could not be reached for comment, but given the red flags raised about several individuals on the bench, it is hard to imagine the government supporting any call to extend the retirement age of judges from 66 to 70.

Last week, Court of Appeal judge Hamid Sultan Abu Backer lit a fuse under the judiciary with an affidavit where he accused senior judges of judicial misconduct, fixing cases and defrauding the government. 

While most of his barbs seemed to have been aimed at the former chief justice Raus Sharif and former president of the Court of Appeal Zulkefli Makinuddin, he made it clear that current senior judges were also guilty of trampling on the federal constitution or sitting idly while misconduct was committed on the bench.

The affidavit was done in support of an application by lawyer Sangeet Kaur Deo seeking a declaration that Chief Justice Richard Malanjum had failed in his duty to complete investigations into two cases of judicial interference.

Calls for a Royal Commission of Inquiry from civil society groups and Pakatan Harapan politicians have grown louder in the wake of Hamid’s allegations. 

In his affidavit, Hamid also noted that senior judges had discussed with the previous government the possibility of extending the retirement age for judges from 66 to 70. This discussion, he noted, was in breach of the concept of the separation of powers that began when Najib Razak was prime minister.

Hamid said he was told that the old cabinet was supportive of the proposal to extend the retirement age of judges but could not muster two-thirds support in Parliament to get amend the constitution.

Against the backdrop of damning allegations on the judiciary, any move by the Mahathir government to put a proposal to extend the retirement age of judges will likely be unsuccessful. 

Over the past few months, supporters of increasing the retirement age of judges have argued that those in senior positions needed more time to put in plans to reform the judiciary. 

But Hamid’s affidavit raises serious questions on the reform credentials of the senior judges.

Malanjum is due to retire in April while the president of the Court of Appeal Ahmad Maarop completes his term in May. – February 19, 2019.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments


  • The PH government should outright reject this proposal from the judiciary. The government should only consider extending the retirement age of judges from 66 to 70 after the present bunch of judges in the Federal Court retire by November 2019. The proposal can be deferred to 2020 after an RCI completes their investigations into allegations of corruption and misconduct in the judiciary. The Bar Council should not support this proposal and make their position clear to the de facto Law Minister.

    Posted 7 years ago by Gerard Lourdesamy · Reply

  • Best is to maintain the retirement ages of judges at 66. That aside, the PH Government should call for the immediate set up of the RCI..

    Posted 7 years ago by Kampung Boy · Reply

    • Those judges, including the juniors, who are found guilty of corruption and intentionally flawed judgement should be sacked immediately with no pension and perks.

      Posted 7 years ago by T E · Reply