Should we ban ZUS Coffee?


Chu Min Wei

Calls have been raised to boycott ZUS Coffee over the chain's perceived connection to the Greek god Zeus. – Screenshot, November 20, 2023.

AMID Malaysia’s vibrant cultural tapestry, the recent uproar surrounding ZUS Coffee calls for a deeper exploration into the nuances of cultural sensitivity and responsible consumerism.

The controversy, sparked by claims of a so-called connection between the coffee chain’s name and Greek mythology, provides an opportunity to discuss the broader implications of extremism in consumer activism.

As we delve into this discourse, the focus shifts from the specifics of the ZUS Coffee situation to a broader conversation about the importance of education, moderation, and thoughtful consideration in our consumer choices.

The call to boycott ZUS Coffee is based on the brand’s perceived link to the Greek god Zeus. The connection is assumed because of the chain’s name and logo design. 

People called for boycotts to show support for the Palestinian community as it is believed that the ZUS Coffee business is related to Israel.

However, rather than delving into the specifics of this particular case, let us use it as a springboard to discuss the potential dangers of extreme reactions and the importance of informed decision-making.

Extremism in consumer activism, as exemplified by calls for blanket boycotts, can inadvertently harm local businesses and people who may have no direct connection to the perceived issue.

It is crucial to emphasise the need for education and understanding before making decisions based on surface-level observation. Understanding the cultural context and intentions behind a brand’s identity can foster a more nuanced approach to these situations.

Support for local businesses, especially those facing economic challenges, should be a cornerstone of responsible consumerism.

In the case of ZUS Coffee, the rallying cry to support a home-grown Malaysian brand highlights the positive impact consumers can have on their local communities.

This support becomes even more meaningful when considering factors such as the brand’s adherence to Halal certification, reflecting a commitment to cultural and religious standards.

A valuable aspect of this discussion is the acknowledgment that cultural symbols and references are pervasive in our daily lives. Rather than succumbing to knee-jerk reactions, it is essential to promote an understanding of these symbols and their context.

Education plays a pivotal role in fostering cultural awareness and mitigating the potential for misinterpretation.

In a democratic society, the freedom to protest and boycott is a fundamental right that empowers individuals to voice their concerns and contribute to societal discourse.

It is a cornerstone of democracy that allows citizens to express dissent, draw attention to perceived injustices, and advocate for change. The recent call for boycotting ZUS Coffee is a testament to the vigor of democratic expression.

However, it is imperative to recognise that with this freedom comes the responsibility of informed and discerning activism.

The broader conversation extends beyond ZUS Coffee to encompass international movements and calls for boycotts related to geopolitical issues, such as the situation in Palestine.

Expressing solidarity with causes is commendable, but it should be done with a measured and informed approach.

ZUS Coffee, as a local brand, deserves more support from us during this economic difficulty rather than being boycotted just because of the similarity of its name with Greek mythology.

Blanket boycotts risk oversimplifying complex issues and may not contribute meaningfully to positive changes.

As consumers, we have the power to effect change through thoughtful choices and support for initiatives aligned with our values. Instead of resorting to extreme measures, individuals can channel their efforts into raising awareness, supporting organisations working towards positive change, and engaging in informed conversations.

This approach allows for a more constructive dialogue surrounding global and local issues.

In conclusion, the ZUS Coffee controversy serves as a catalyst to discuss the broader topic of extremism in consumer activism and the importance of education and moderation.

By fostering cultural awareness, supporting local businesses, and engaging in informed conversation, we can navigate the complex landscape of consumer choices with responsibility and nuance.

Let us strive for a balanced and informed approach that reflects our values while respecting the diversity that defines our interconnected world. – November 20, 2023.

* Chu Min Wei holds a degree in Journalism (minor in Political Science) from UTAR and is a member of the Agora Society. She is interested in the study of subculture and media, and believes that institutional reform could have a greater impact on marginalised subcultures and the media landscape.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments