THE disparity in sentences between different individuals raises concerns about the fairness and consistency of Malaysia’s justice system, said former MP Kua Kia Soong.

He said the sentence on Muar MP Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahmah yesterday highlighted a contrast with Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi who was given a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA).

The Kuala Lumpur High Court yesterday sentenced Syed Saddiq to seven years of imprisonment, a RM10 million fine and two strokes of the cane after being found guilty on charges of abetting in criminal breach of trust, misappropriation of funds and money laundering amounting to RM1 million.

Previously, in September, the Kuala Lumpur High Court had granted Zahid a DNAA for 47 corruption charges, including bribery and money laundering involving substantial sums.

“This inconsistency raises questions about the application of justice,” said Kua, who is also a Suaram director, in a statement today.

He said questions may arise about the factors influencing these outcomes and the need for a fair and transparent judicial process.

He also said the caning punishment given to Syed Saddiq raised concerns about its appropriateness in a modern and rights-respecting legal system.

“The inclusion of caning has sparked criticism, with some arguing that such corporal punishment is barbaric and violates international human rights principles.

“Caning is considered a breach of individuals’ fundamental rights to respect for human dignity and physical integrity.”

Kua said the use of corporal punishment is viewed as a violation of international human rights and underscores the need for Malaysia to align its with global standards.

“A fair and transparent judicial system that upholds human rights is a more constructive way to address concerns about the inconsistency in sentencing,” he added. – November 10, 2023.