THE Court of Appeal has fixed August 11 to decide on ex-PM Najib Razak’s appeal to disqualify two lawyers from representing former attorney-general Tommy Thomas in Najib’s RM1.9 million case against him.  

The three-member panel of judges led by Justice Hanipah Farikullah said they needed time to consider the submissions and case authorities put forward by parties in the suit. 

The other two judges sitting with Justice Hanipah were Azimah Omar and Azhahari Kamal Ramli. 

In the proceeding today, the court heard submissions by Najib’s lawyer, Firoz Hussein Ahmad Jamaluddin and Thomas’s counsel Alan Adrian Gomez. 

Najib, 69, is appealing against the High Court’s decision on August 19 last year dismissing his application to disqualify Gomez and another lawyer, Mervyn Lai Wei Shiung, both partners in Messrs Tommy Thomas, from representing Thomas in his (Najib’s) suit.  

Najib is seeking a declaration that Thomas had committed misfeasance in public office and is claiming RM1.9 million in damages, which will cover consultation fees for the audit team to review documentation for preparation of facts to address the prosecution against him.  

He said it was not appropriate to appoint Gomez and Lai to represent Thomas as they were from the same firm as the defendant.  

Najib had been charged in court in the case of 1Malaysia Development Berhad and International Petroleum Investment Company for abuse of power under the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 and for money laundering under the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001. 

The former Pekan MP said the charges against him were part of a move planned in advance by Thomas and was in line with the Pakatan Harapan government’s plan at the time. 

On November 25 last year, the High Court allowed Thomas’s application to strike out Najib’s suit against him. Najib filed a notice of appeal on December 22 and the Court of Appeal has fixed October 4 for the hearing. 

Earlier on, Firoz, in his submission, focussed on Rule 5 of the Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rule 197, which states that lawyers should not accept a case if it is difficult to maintain professional independence. 

He questioned whether the lawyers from Messrs Tommy Thomas could maintain their professional independence, saying members of the same firm should not represent partners, consultants, or other lawyers in contentious matters. 

Thomas was the founding member of the law firm. He was attorney-general from June 4, 2018 to February 28, 2020. 

Firoz said Thomas had pecuniary interests at the law firm, adding that with the two lawyers from Messrs Tommy Thomas acting for him (Thomas), it would create a conflict of interest. 

Gomez countered by saying Thomas, as a consultant in the firm, had no pecuniary interest in it.  

He said the lawsuit filed against Thomas was for alleged misfeasance in public office when he was the attorney-general, adding that there was no conflict of interest that prevented them from representing Thomas as they were not involved in the 1MDB case, the heart of Najib’s lawsuit. 

Najib was present at the appeal hearing today. His wife Rosmah Mansor and son, Mohamad Nazifuddin, were also present. 

Also representing Najib in the appeal were lawyers Daniel Annamalai, Woo J Enn and Melody Tham Cheng Yee, while Lai and Haikaldin Mahyidin acted for Thomas. – Bernama, July 11, 2023.