Is the key to success just the Key? Not so for Robert Kuok


Joe Samad

Bumiputeras can learn many lesson from Robert Kuok's book, including honour before profits, building network and connections, being humble but firm and filial piety. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, March 14, 2018.

WRITING books in Malaysia is a risky business. Either your books get banned or some deranged person will call you all kinds of crude names even before they turn the last page of your book.

In one famous case, a Muslim university lecturer claimed that when he read Hannah Yeoh’s autobiography, he could have been drawn to Christianity. Such is the situation in Malaysia, when the words, cartoons or stories from a book can be turned into political fodder.

Malaysia has become a society full of sick people. Sometimes I wonder if we have the medicinal or spiritual cure for these kinds of ills.

If we don’t like what we see or hear, we are told by our leaders to leave the country and give up our citizenship. You can also be challenged to a fist fight or dared to contest in an election even if you are already in your 90’s.

Toxic Muslim preacher and wanted fugitive Zakir Naik are more revered than Malaysians who contributed to the success of country, and even given permanent residence.

The recent Robert Kuok controversy started when a pro-Umno blogger accused him of having given money to the opposition Democratic Action Party (DAP). Like many of this blogger’s concoctions, there was no proof offered – just wild accusations. Since then all hell broke loose over Kuok’s alleged sin.

Donations are nothing new to Malaysia. Some people claimed that they received billions from Arab donors and hide through complicated layers of offshore accounts.

Kuok did not hide about political donation in his book. He said, ‘I was often asked to give substantial donations to the ruling parties, Umno and MCA, after independence in 1957. I gave willingly, happily and freely”.

Despite denial by all parties named, some saw an opportunity to gain political mileage by disparaging Kuok, the 96th richest man in the world according to Forbes 2018 Billionaires list.

Prime Minister Najib Razak also slipped into the debacle. He said that the key to Kuok becoming the rice and sugar king in Malaysia was given to him by the ruling government.

Kuok is driven, hard-working, industrious and disciplined – but that is not enough, according to Najib. Everyone still needs the key.

However, even if you are given the key, it all depends on what you do with the key. There are bumiputras who got APs (import car permits) and sell it for a quick buck, while some borrow millions for cattle farming and end up buying properties. Some are appointed Chairman of land agencies and end up buying hotels instead of plantation land.

Some Bumiputra elites are also given keys – a different type of keys called cronyism. Kuok in his book says, “Cronyism is different. Cronies are lapdogs who polish a leader’s ego. In return, the leader hands out national favours to them. A nation’s assets, project or business should never be for anyone to handout, neither king nor a Prime Minister”.

Bumiputras can learn a lot from Kuok. Honour before profits, learning from others, building network and connections, being humble but firm, filial piety, and listening and learning are some of the life lessons gleaned from his book. Apart from the licenses, there are no extra advantages gained by Kuok.

In some cases he was not the only one given licenses for rice and sugar – he had to compete like the rest.

Kuok was not born with a golden spoon in his mouth unlike some of the political elites in Malaysia. At times, there was not enough food on the table. He was bullied during the colonial era and endured the harsh Japanese occupation, and managed to survive and adapt to the changing circumstances.

Many Bumiputras who are given keys in different forms by the government are still dependent on the government for handouts, be it overseas scholarships, seed funding, subsidised housing, special assistance, and skills training. Many have failed to climb the ladder of success despite their advantage over other races.

In November 2013, Minister Nancy Shukri said poor Bumiputeras will resort to theft in her defence of the government’s move to reintroduce a race-preferential economic policy that has drawn the ire of Malaysia’s minority communities. She told a public forum on international covenants organised by the Malaysian Bar that the Bumiputeras Economic Empowerment Policy was needed to help fix the unequal wealth distribution among the races.

After 54 years in Malaysia, the government is still giving out free crutches to Bumiputeras, hoping they will learn to walk without assistance one day.

When we can learn much from people like Kuok, we call them all kinds of derogatory names.

Kuok used the key given by the government to climb up the corporate ladder, employ thousands of Malaysians and gave them company shares as a reward for their contributions, poured money back to the economy to regenerate more wealth for the nation, and donated money to charitable causes through his foundation.

Some people use their big mouth to make them appear invincible and strong to deceive others; some remain humble and quiet and bid his time.

The saddest thing is the ruling party leadership did not come out strongly to defend Kuok who has contributed much to the Malaysian economy. But then, that is to be expected.

In the final chapter of his book Kuok said “The Laws of morality are as sure and powerful as the natural law of gravity. Under the Universal law, you reap what you sow. When you violate fairness and true justice, it will come back to haunt you”. – March 14, 2018.

* Joe Samad has wide experience working for international companies and government GLC. He is interested in new technology applications in a shared economy and issues affecting the nation,  sharing his worldview across various media platforms.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments


  • great

    Posted 6 years ago by Astann astann · Reply

  • Thanks Joe for this enlightening summary of events !

    Posted 6 years ago by Malaysia Forward · Reply

  • Najib said "Kuok is driven, hard-working, industrious and disciplined – but that is not enough, according to Najib. EVERYONE still needs the key". NAJIB IS ABSOLUTELY COMPLETELY WRONG.. Fact is, any nation governed properly, HARD-WORK, INDUSTRY AND DISCIPLINED IS ENOUGH FOR MOST, SHOULD BE ENOUGH. Any system where too many people need a "key" to succeed is NEVER going to work.

    Not only that, KOUK NEVER NEEDED A KEY.. He was ALREADY a successful trader even before he was "given the key". In fact, it was because he was already successful, he was "given the key". Looking back, what was given was NOT THAT MUCH. KOUK WAS GOING TO BE HUGELY SUCCESSFUL WITH OR WITHOUT HELP FROM THE GOVT.

    Unless, you are saying a normal functional government is NOT the right of every citizen, that its the "key" to success, WHICH IS PERVERSION. then there is NOT EVEN A BASIS FOR NAJIB'S STATEMENT.

    NAJIB IS OVER ENTITLED, OVER PRIVILLEGED, MEDIOCRE.

    Posted 6 years ago by Bigjoe Lam · Reply

  • Money you give to people who will die if they don’t recieve your money is properly called donation.

    Money you give to orphans, old folks , monks and priest , people who have lost everything in a calamity , is for example , properly called a donation.

    What you give as donation cannot obviously be returned to you for obvious reasons - the people you donated it won’t need your donation if they could afford to return it.

    When Robert Kuok gave money to political parties freely and willingly , it is not a donation, because political parties won’t die if they dont recieve donations from Robert Kuok , and because political parties are able to get money by some other means .

    What Robert Kuok gave to political parties should rightfully be called a gift or a favour or a debt or even a bribe just like the way najib recieving the money from Arabian royalty should rightly be called a gift or a favour or a debt or a bribe.

    Robert Kuok’s Story is a rags to riches story of a person in Malaysia and China and Hong Kong , not Switzerland or Norway of Finland. For An individual who has the ambition to rise up in Malaysia or China or Hong Kong during rober kuok’s time , hard work and intelligence alone is not enough - you also need to grease the wheels every now and then.

    Nobody blames Robert Kuok for doing what he has to do - when you start from scratch, you tend to be forced to use slime as the mortar to build your foundation, whether you want to or not.

    If individuals like Robert kuoks did not build what they built, we would not be where we are today .

    We should be grateful to people like Robert Kuok without needing to whitewash history .

    We should not lie to ourselves calling a favour a donation or what nots.

    The more lies we need to sustain our self esteem , the weaker has our spirit is become.

    Posted 6 years ago by Nehru Sathiamoorthy · Reply

  • Which of these would come first? Hard work or the key? This reveals the stark differences between the malays including nazri and najib, and the chinese. Success or failure depends on picking the right choice to commence.

    Posted 6 years ago by Landy Oz · Reply

  • Which of these would come first? Hard work or the key? This reveals the stark differences between the malays including nazri and najib, and the chinese. Success or failure depends on picking the right choice to commence.

    Posted 6 years ago by Landy Oz · Reply