THE Court of Appeal fixed May 12 for further case management of the prosecution’s appeal against the acquittal of Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi of 40 corruption charges linked to the foreign visa system (FVS).

A case management of the appeal was conducted today before Court of Appeal deputy registrar Syahliza Warnoh.

Zahid’s lawyers had submitted a representation in January this year asking the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) to consider discontinuing the prosecution’s appeal.

The prosecution filed a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal on September 26 last year against the Shah Alam High Court’s decision to acquit and discharge Zahid, who is now deputy prime minister, of all charges after ruling the prosecution did not have a prima facie case against him.

The Umno president pleaded not guilty to 33 counts of receiving bribes amounting to S$13.56 million (RM44.99 million) from Ultra Kirana Sdn Bhd for himself as then home minister to extend the contract of the company as the operator of a one-stop centre service in China and the FVS, as well as to maintain its contract with the home ministry to supply the integrated FVS.

According to the charge sheet, Zahid was alleged to have committed those offences at Seri Satria, Precinct 16, Putrajaya, and Country Heights, Kajang, between October 2014 and March 2018.

He claimed trial to 33 alternative charges under section 165 of the penal code, where he was charged in his capacity as then home minister with receiving bribes amounting to S$13.56 million in relation to the FVS between 2014 and 2017.

For the other seven charges, he was alleged to have obtained for himself cash of S$1,150,000, RM3 million, 15,000 Swiss francs (RM72,150.99) and US$15,000 (RM66,187.50) from the same company, which he knew had a connection with his official functions.

Zahid was charged with allegedly committing the offences at a house in Country Heights, Kajang, between June 2015 and October 2017.

In its petition of appeal filed on December 29 last year, the prosecution submitted 14 reasons of fact and law made by the High Court judge on the question of whether there was bribery in the exchange of money in the case. – Bernama, March 31, 2023.