Debate Dr Shad, not investigate, says G25


Professor Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi's controversial article titled 'Religious radicalism on the rise' was published in The Star on November 23. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, December 24, 2017.

THERE should be a more democratic approach to deal with constitutional law expert Professor Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi’s article in a local newspaper, which touched on the topic of religious radicalism, said the G25. 

The group of prominent retired Malay civil servants suggested an open forum for experts to challenge Dr Shad intellectually, instead of through a probe by the authorities. 


Effective July 2018, access to full reports will only be available with a subscription. Sign-up now and enjoy one (1) week free access!

Subscribe Now!


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments


  • This is an ideological war and the other side believes in actual.physical war to win. They are not interested in debate, to them.talj is only for them to win, losing is unacceptable, dying and killing is. Only way for this "debate" to win is failure in reality.

    Posted 2 years ago by Bigjoe Lam

  • Dictators are not capable of debating. Dictator knows the power of the fist and uses it to bully, intimidate and humiliate those who do not support them. Take a look at axa affin life insurance berhad - a queky chief agency bullied staffs/agents over 4 years. The irreparable damages include low agency morale, low production, massive losses, poor agent recruitment, thousands of agents jumped ship to join competitors. Read more axa toxic management at changenow083.blogspot.com

    Posted 2 years ago by Chris Ng