AHMAD Maslan today withdrew his appeal against a session’s court decision in dismissing his application to drop the money laundering and giving false statement charges made against him.

Judicial commissioner Muhammad Jamil Hussin withdrew the appeal after Ahmad’s lawyer, Atiqa Nazihah Azmi, told the court that the notice to withdraw the appeal was filed on August 3.

Deputy public prosecutor Mahadi Abdul Jumaat confirmed the matter and told the court that the prosecution did not object to it.

On August 14, the High Court  dismissed Ahmad’s an application to revise a lower court’s decision in dismissing his application for the court to drop the charges against him.

Judicial Commissioner Aslam Zainuddin dismissed the application on the grounds that there was no mistake by the sessions court in dismissing the Pontian MP’s application to quash the charges against him. 

Ahmad, 54, was charged with money laundering by not stating his real income on the RM2 million he received from former prime minister Najib Razak in the Income Tax Return Form for Assessment Year 2013.

In doing so, he had violated Section 113(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act 1967.

The offence was allegedly committed at the IRB, Duta Branch, Government Office Complex, Jalan Tuanku Abdul Halim, on April 30, 2014.

The charge, framed under Section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001, provides a maximum fine of RM5 million, or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, if found guilty.

The other charge was for giving false statements to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) when questioned by MACC investigating officer Mohd Zairi Zainal over the issue at the media conference room, Parliament Building,  Jalan Parlimen, between 2.45pm and 3.30pm on July 4, 2019.

The charge, framed under Section 32(8)c) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001, provides a maximum fine of RM3 million, or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, if found guilty. – Bernama, September 24, 2020.