Keep the ban on fireworks for our children’s sake


WE read with serious concern the announcement by Local Government Development Minister Nga Kor Ming that the cabinet has agreed to legalise and regulate fireworks and firecrackers.

The reasons provided for this move are to “halt the smuggling of these items” and “to gain from the duties on these items”.

Fireworks have been illegal since 1955, and are classified in the same category as dynamite. The cabinet must realise why fireworks and firecrackers were banned in the first place.

Fireworks and firecrackers can be dangerous, occasionally fatal, often resulting in serious permanent injury.

Children are especially vulnerable since they are unaware of the dangers. Common injuries include burns, cuts, lost fingers and damaged to the eyes.

As senior doctors (paediatricians, surgeons and public health specialists) who have worked with the damaging effects of fireworks, we have experience with numerous children that have lost their fingers and eyes; resulting in life-long disability.

For every child or adult who is injured there are many traumatised family members. Those who are older will remember how our media was full of images, at every festival season, of children damaged by fireworks.

There is extensive research to support this experience in many countries where fireworks are still legal.

In the US, firework injuries have been increasing over time. Local research has shown that, when we do not have a fireworks ban, the easy access leads to homemade explosive devices, which are even more devastating.

We need to recognise that fireworks have other deleterious effects. Fireworks contribute to air and noise pollution, and are very stressful for pets and wildlife.

Young parents are up in arms against otherwise friendly neighbours who set off firecrackers causing untold fear and distress to their children, not to mention the increased fire risk to houses and buildings.

It is not logical to use the inability to prevent an item from being smuggled as a good excuse to remove a ban.

What we require is better enforcement. A civilised society, or the Madani culture that Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has made the clarion call of his new administration, should maintain such a ban.

Note that Hong Kong has banned fireworks since the 1960s and Singapore since 1972.

Instead of removing this ban, the government should instruct agencies to better enforce it, as well as promote education about its dangers.

Parents should be encouraged to educate their children about the dangers of fireworks. The media has an important role in highlighting this too.

Fireworks related injuries are preventable and we appeal to the government to maintain the ban. The solution to illegal and dangerous activities is enforcement, not legalisation.

No amount of taxes and duties collected will be enough to protect the health and safety of our children.

If the cabinet legalises fireworks and firecrackers in the country, then every person that loses eyes or fingers; every person that become permanently disabled; or every person whose future is impaired will be the government’s doing. – February 6, 2023.

* Press statement by the Malaysian Paediatric Association, the Asia Pacific Paediatric Associations, the Malaysian Society of Surgery of the Hand, the Malaysian Society of Ophthalmology, the Malaysian Health Coalition and the Malaysian Medical Association.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments


  • A FOOLISH IDEA FOR GAINING POLITICAL MILEAGE. There have been numerous cases in the past of innocent children suffering permanent disability from playing with various types of fireworks, yet it is considered that the innocent children don't have to be protected from the unseen danger that they are being exposed to by adults.
    On the other hand, talk of using a light cane to discipline misbehaving children and all hell breaks loose. The RIGHTS OF THE CHILD are cited for condemning spanking with a light cane. It is termed CORPORAL PUNISHMENT! Corporal punishment is administered on criminals in prison with a cane that is about 3 cm in diameter and 1 meter long. The cane is swung with full force by a heavily built person and struck on the bare bottoms of the person.
    Spanking is nothing like corporal punishment. The two are worlds apart. Yet there is so much hullabaloo about spanking.
    Firecrackers / fireworks have blown children's fingers and hands off, yet they are OK because taxes are earned from them. What is our philosophy about "protecting" the rights of the child"?
    HAS A CHILD NO RIGHT TO BE BROUGHT UP AS A DISCIPLINED PERSON? Then why is a little spanking (only if other methods fail) during his habit forming years so obnoxious when it can prevent bad habits getting internalised and carried into adult life?

    Posted 1 year ago by Ravinder Singh · Reply