Costly display of Sabah’s intent to progress


A lit ‘Sabah Maju Jaya’ signage at Likas Bay. Former Sabah chief minister Mohd Shafie Apdal says the million of ringgit the sitting state government spent out outdoor advertising would have been better spent on improving the people’s living conditions. – Facebook pic, May 4, 2022.

Commentary by Mustafa K. Anuar

PUBLIC funds are expected to be spent judiciously by the government with the supposed priority of improving the living standards of the common people, especially the needy and marginalised.

Financial prudence is obviously necessary especially when resources are scarce or limited.

That is why it has raised an eyebrow recently when former Sabah chief minister Mohd Shafie Apdal alleged that the sitting Sabah government had spent millions of ringgit on “Sabah Maju Jaya” (Let Sabah Prosper) signboards across the state. 

The state motto of Sabah Maju Jaya is to indicate the Sabah development plan for 2021-2025. 

It would be a rude irony if the government had indeed spent lots of money just to flaunt its intention to develop a state that happens to be one of the poorest in the federation.

Surely, the money spent on such outdoor advertising would be better spent on uplifting the people’s living conditions.

An intention is as good as the signage, which is not enough. After all, isn’t the proof of the pudding is in the eating?

As rightly pointed out by Shafie, who incidentally had governed the state in the past, the money could have been spent on, say, preventing frequent power cuts in Sabah, such as the recent case at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital. Such occurrences could be harmful to those with serious ailments. 

To be sure, this is the state where 18-year-old Veveonah Mosibin had to climb up a tree in her Sabanalang Pitas village to get an internet connection in order to sit for her examinations. Soon after, ruling politicians scrambled to come to her aid.

But despite that incident, communications in terms of the internet and telephone lines generally remains a problem to the common people.

For example, interior villages such as Kg Long Pasia, Kg Long Mio, Kg Ulu Bole, Kg Meligan and Kg Iburuh recently faced internet connection problems and telephone line disruption after the power generator of the telecommunications towers in Kg Long Pasia and Kg Ulu Bole was damaged.

Improvement of Sabahans’ living conditions certainly requires more than just feel-good signage. Good infrastructure is essential.

School children from Kg Nangkawangan, for instance, reportedly have to risk their lives daily to cross a river near their homes after the suspension bridge was washed away by floods last month.

They use bamboo rafts or a “zip line” to cross the river at their own peril. This is obviously not a sign of a state that has progressed smoothly ever since it helped form the Malaysian federation.

To be fair, such a feel-good signage phenomenon is not peculiar to Sabah. 

In the past, there were signboards in the peninsula that informed the public about certain community projects, such as community halls or bridges, to be undertaken by the federal government, although not as expensively crafted as the ones purportedly constructed in Sabah.

Some of these well-publicised projects unfortunately never saw the light of day in Peninsular Malaysia. Only the signboards are still standing as a grim reminder of development projects that had not been fulfilled.

People’s genuine expectation of development should not be fed with expensive publicity, which is, as intimated above, a waste of public funds.

Accomplished development projects are the best testimony to a sitting government’s good intention. – May 4, 2022.


Sign up or sign in here to comment.


Comments